Везде
THE BASIS OF LIABILITY IN CONTEMPORARY CRIMINAL LAW
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE BASIS OF LIABILITY IN CONTEMPORARY CRIMINAL LAW
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000617-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Ivan Kozochkin 
Edition
Issue 10
Pages
83-92
Abstract
Annotation: the article deals with the three main types of basis of liability in the contemporary criminal law: bipartite, tripartite and quadripartite classifications. It is shown their content and application in the criminal law as well. It is pointed out a tendency towards giving up of archaic terms of actus reus and mens rea in the common law countries towards broadening their notions and it is also pointed out the possibility of imposing of strict liability. Bipartite classification of basis of liability in the criminal law France and Italy sometimes is added by so called legal element (l'élément légal). It is shown that tripartite system is typical of criminal law of Germany, Japan and some other countries and quadripartite - of criminal law of Russia and states of SNG. It is underlined therein the advantages of the latter in comparison with the others. In this connection the author is critical about sayings of american scholar G. Fletcher towards the Russian criminal law in particular concerning his prognosis that the quadripartite system would unlikely to survive the jurisprudence of the post-communist period.
Keywords
law, criminal liability, system, element of crime, justification and excuse.
Date of publication
01.10.2010
Number of purchasers
2
Views
960
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Latinskie yuridicheskie izrecheniya / Sost. E.I. Temnov. M., 1996. S. 259.  
  
 2. Latinskaya yuridicheskaya frazeologiya / Sost. B.S. Nikiforov. M., 1979. S. 160.  
  
 3. Card, Cross and Jones. Richard Card. Criminal law. L., 2001. P. 50.  
  
 4. Panteleev V.A., Kozochkin I.D., Likhachev V.A. Ugolovnoe pravo razvivayuschikhsya stran. Obschaya chast'. M., 1988. S. 53-54  
  
 5. Dressler J. Understanding criminal law. Matthew Bender & Co. 2006.  
  
 6. Robinson P. Criminal law. N.Y., 1997. P. 141.  
  
 7. UK shtata Kentukki (st. 501.060) ili Tekhasa (Ugolovnyj kodeks shtata Texac) / Pod red. i predisl. I.D. Kozochkina. SPb., 2006. S. 83.  
  
 8. Lafave W. Criminal law. St. Paul, MN. West. 2003. P. 301.  
  
 9. Sayre F. Mens rea. 45 Harv. L., 1932. P. 975.  
  
 10. Morissette V. United States, 342 U.S. 246. 72 Ct. 250 L. Ed. 288 (1952).  
  
 11. Blackstone W. Commentaries on the laws of England. 1769 (reprinted). Beacon Press, 1962. P. 21.  
  
 12. Mallick M.R. A practical guide to criminal court practice and procedure. Calcutta, 1981. P. 434.  
  
 13. Kozochkin I.D. Ugolovnoe pravo SShA: uspekhi i problemy reformirovaniya. SPb., 2007. S. 118-123     
  
 14. Ugolovnyj kodeks Avstralii 1955 g. / Pod red. i predisl. I.D. Kozochkina, E.N. Trikoz. SPb., 2002. S. 54-57.  
  
 15. Samaha J. Criminal law. Thomson / Wadsworth. 2005. P. 55, 56.  
  
 16. Hall J. General principles of the criminal law. Indianapolis. Bobbs-Merrill. 1960. P. 88  
  
 17. Kozochkin I.D. Strogaya otvetstvennost' v ugolovnom prave Anglii i SShA // Pravovedenie. 2000. № 1. S. 136.     
  
 18. Desportes F., LeGunehec F. Le nouveau droit pénal. Paris, 1999. P. 353, 375.  
  
 19. Ugolovnoe pravo zarubezhnykh gosudarstv / Pod red. i predisl. I.D. Kozochkina. M., 2003. S. 286  
  
 20. Ugolovnoe pravo zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. Ponyatie prestupleniya i vina / Otv. red. F.M. Reshetnikov. M., 1972. S. 65, 72.  
  
 21. Rassat M.-L. Droit pénal général. Paris, 1999. P. 388  
  
 22. Mantovani F. Dritto penale: parte generale. Padova, 2001. R. 275.  
  
 23. Fiandaca G., Musco E. Dritto penale. Bologna, Zanichelli Editore. 1995.  
  
 24. Kuznetsova N.F., Vel'tsel' L. Ugolovnoe pravo FRG. M., 1980.  
  
 25. Naumov A.V. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obschaya chast'. Kurs lektsij. M., 1996. S. 147.  
  
 26. Tagantsev N.S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Lektsii. Chast' Obschaya. T. 1. M., 1994. S. 32, 33.  
  
 27. Fletcher G. The grammar of criminal law. Vol. 1. Foundations. N.Y., 2007. R. 48.  
  
 28. Robinson P. Criminal law defenses. St. Paul, Minn. West publishing. 1984. §25 (d)  
  
 29. Robinson P. Criminal law. 1997. P. 479  
  
 30. Buff. Criminal law review. 2003. P. 833.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate