The use of the demonstrative group in Russian narrative discourse
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
The use of the demonstrative group in Russian narrative discourse
Annotation
PII
S0373-658X0000616-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
51-68
Abstract
Вопросы языкознания, The use of the demonstrative group in Russian narrative discourse
Keywords
deixis, demonstratives, discourse, narrative, Russian
Date of publication
05.05.2004
Number of purchasers
0
Views
488
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. O.Yu. Boguslavskaya, I.A. Murav'eva. Mekhanizm anaforicheskoj nominatsii // Modelirovanie yazykovoj deyatel'nosti v intellektual'nykh sistemakh / Pod red. A.E. Kibrik, A.S. Narin'yani. M., 1987. 
2. A.A. Kibrik. Mekhanizmy ustraneniya referentsial'nogo konflikta v russkom yazyke. Modelirovanie yazykovoj deyatel'nosti v intellektual'nykh sistemakh / Pod red. A.E. Kibrik, A.S. Narin'yani. M., 1987.
3. A.A. Kibrik. Modelirovanie mnogofaktornogo protsessa: vybor referentsial'nogo sredstva v russkom diskurse // Vestnik MGU. 1997. № 4.
4. G.E. Krejdlin, A.S. Chekhov. Sootnoshenie semantiki, aktual'nogo chleneniya i pragmatiki v leksikograficheskom opisanii anaforicheskikh mestoimenij (na materiale mestoimenij gruppy TOT) // Preprint Instituta russkogo yazyka AN SSSR. Vyp. 178. M., 1988.
5. L.I. Kulikov. O vzaimozamenyaemosti anaforicheskikh mestoimenij ehtot i takoj // Vestnik MGU. Seriya 96: Filologiya. 1985. № 1.
6. E.V. Paducheva. Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost' s dejstvitel'nost'yu. 1985.
7. Russkaya grammatika. 1980. V 2-kh tomakh. M., 1980.
8. M. Ariel. Accessing noun phrase antecedents. London, 1990.
9. M. Ariel. Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach // Journal of Linguistics. 1994. № 30.
10. R. Geluykens. The pragmatics of discourse anaphora in English: Evidence from conversational repair. Berlin, 1994.
11. T. Given ed. Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-linguistic study. Amsterdam, 1983.
12. H.P. Grice. Logic and conversation // P. Cole, J.L. Morgan (eds.). Syntax and semantics 3. Speech acts. 1975.
13. J.K. Gundel, N. Hedberg, R. Zacharski. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse // Language. 1993. V. 69. № 2.
14. Y. Huang. Discourse anaphora: Four theoretical models // Journal of pragmatics. 2000. №32.
15. A.A. Kibrik. A cognitive calculative approach towards discourse anaphora // P. Baker, A. Hardie, T. McEnery, A. Siewierska (eds.) Proceedings of the discourse anaphora and reference resolution conference (DAARC 2000). Lancaster University: University Center for computer corpus research on language, Technical papers 12. 2000.
16. A. Kronrod, O. Engel. Accessibility theory and referring expressions in newspaper headlines // Journal of Pragmatics. 2001. № 33.
17. G. Leech. Principles of pragmatics. London, 1983.
18. S.C. Levinson. Three levels of meaning // Frank Palmer (ed.). Grammar and meaning. Cambridge, 1995.
19. A. Maes, L. Noordman. Demonstrative nominal anaphors: a case of nonidentificational markedness // Linguistics. 1995. № 33.
20. T. Reinhart. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London, 1983.
21. Ken-Ichi Takami. Anaphora in Japanese: some semantic and pragmatic considerations. Journal of pragmatics. 1987. № 11.
22. R.S. Tomlin. Linguistic reflections of cognitive events // R.S. Tomlin (ed.). Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam, 1987.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate