RAS Social ScienceГосударство и право Gosudarstvo i pravo

  • ISSN (Print) 1026-9452
  • ISSN (Online) 2713-0398

“LIVING CONSTITUTION”: MODERN INTERPRETATIONS (INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE)

PII
S27130398S1026945225100171-1
DOI
10.7868/S2713039825100171
Publication type
Theses
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 10
Pages
193-206
Abstract
The article is an overview of the most interesting reports presented at the International Scientific Conference “Living constitution: modern interpretations” held on June 3, 2025 at the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Representatives of leading scientific institutions and universities of Russia, as well as researchers from Belarus, took part in its work. A wide range of problems related to modern interpretations of the “living constitution” doctrine, which allows adapting constitutional texts to current civilizational challenges without formally amending them, were considered.
Keywords
конституция толкование конституционных текстов конституционный контроль законодательное регулирование функционирование органов публичной власти
Date of publication
05.12.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
8

References

  1. 1. Васильева Т.А. Конституционное собрание в Ирландии: делиберативная демократия в действии//Сравнительное конституционное обозрение. 2022. № 6 (151). C.46–71.
  2. 2. Vasilieva T.A. The Constitutional Assembly in Ireland: deliberative democracy in action//Comparative Constitutional Review.2022. No. 6 (151). Pp. 46–71 (in Russ.).
  3. 3. Загретдинов В.И. Верховенство права как конституционная идентичность Европейского Союза//Международное правосудие. 2024. Т. 14. № 3 (51). С. 123–148.
  4. 4. Zagretdinov V.I. The rule of law as the constitutional identity of the European Union//International Justice. 2024. Vol.14. No.3 (51). Pp. 123–148 (in Russ.).
  5. 5. Избранные решения Федерального конституционного суда Германии / сост. Ю.Швабе, Т.Гайсслер; отв. ред. К.Кроуфорд. М., 2018. C. 469–287.
  6. 6. Selected decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany / comp. Yu. Schwabe, T. Geissler; ed. by K. Crawford. M., 2018. Pp. 269–287 (in Russ.).
  7. 7. Ларенц К., Канарис К.-В. Методология юриспруденции/пер. с нем. К.В. Нама. М., 2024. С. 345.
  8. 8. Larents K., Kanaris K.-V. Methodology of jurisprudence / transl. from German. K.V. Nam. M., 2024. P. 345 (in Russ.).
  9. 9. Стоилов Я. Принципы права: понятие и применение/ пер. с болг. Е.М. Кузьминой, Г. Канева; науч. ред. Е.А. Фролова. М., 2023. С. 63.
  10. 10. Stoilov Ya. Principles of law: concept and application / transl. from Bulgarian by E.M. Kuzmina, G. Kanev; scientific ed. By E.A. Frolova. M., 2023. P. 63 (in Russ.).
  11. 11. Тропер М. Проблема толкования и теория верховенства конституции//Сравнительное конституционное обозрение. 2005. № 4 (53). С. 175, 176.
  12. 12. Troper M. The problem of interpretation and the theory of the supremacy of the Constitution//Comparative Constitutional Review. 2005. No. 4 (53). Pp. 175, 176 (in Russ.).
  13. 13. Тропер М. Реалистическая теория толкования//Росс.юрид. журнал. 2006. № 2. С. 9.
  14. 14. Troper M. Realistic theory of interpretation//Russ. legal journal. 2006. No. 2. P. 9 (in Russ.).
  15. 15. Тропер М. Свобода толкования конституционного судьи//Российский ежегодник теории права. 2011. № 4/ под ред. А.В. Полякова. СПб., 2012. С. 193.
  16. 16. Troper M. Freedom of interpretation of the constitutional judge//The Russian Yearbook of the Theory of Law. 2011.No. 4 / ed. by A.V. Polyakov. SPb., 2012. P. 193 (in Russ.).
  17. 17. Atienza M., Manero J.R. A Theory of Legal Sentences. New York, 1998. Pp. 8, 9.
  18. 18. Avila H. Theory of Legal Principles. Dordrecht, 2007. P. 44.
  19. 19. Baraggia A.The “Unwritten” Constitution: Reflections on the Italian Experience//A&C – Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional. 2021. Vol. 21. No. 84. P. 16.
  20. 20. Baude W., Sachs S. The “Common-Good” Manifesto//Harvard Law Review. 2023. Vol. 136. Iss. 3. Pp.861–906.
  21. 21. Frey B.S., Stutzer A. Direct Democracy: Designing a Living Constitution//Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy, Analysis and Evidence / ed. by R.D.Congleton, B.Swedenborg. Cambridge; London, 2006. Pp. 41–90.
  22. 22. Gangwar Sh., Pagedar A. Examining the Living Metaphor in the Indian Constitution//Jindal Global Law Review. 2022. Vol. 13.No. 2. Р. 352, 353.
  23. 23. Jakab A. Re-defining Principles as “Important Rules”. A Сritique of Robert Alexy//On the Nature of Legal Principles:Proceedings of the Special Workshop “The Principles Theory” held at the 23rd World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (IVR), Kraków, 2007 / ed. by M.Borowski. Stuttgart, 2010. P. 146.
  24. 24. Korychka M. The Principles of Law, the Test of Coherenceand Political Morality//On the Nature of Legal Principles: Proceedings of the Special Workshop “The Principles Theory” held at the 23rd World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (IVR), Kraków, 2007 / ed. by M.Borowski. Stuttgart, 2010. P. 162.
  25. 25. Kulwinder Singh Gill, Ramandeep Singh Sidhu. The Living Constitution Theory and Inherent Rights: An Indian Perspective//CASIHR Journal on Human Rights Practice. 2021. Vol.5. Iss. 1. P. 39.
  26. 26. Mojski W. Analiza kryzysu konstytucyjnego z perspektywy funkcjiaksjologicznej konstytucji. Zarys podstawowych zagadnień teoretycznych//Archiwum Filozofii Prawa iFilozofii Społeczne.2022. No. 1 (30). Pp. 55–62.
  27. 27. Morawski L.A Critical Response//VerfBlog. 2017, 3 June.URL: https://verfassungsblog.de/a-critical-response (датаобращения: 28.06.2025).
  28. 28. Politics and Ethics of the Indian Constitution / ed. by R.Bhargava. Oxford, 2008. P. 15.
  29. 29. Sadurski W. Extinguishing the Court: Why There Is No Salvation for the Current Polish Constitutional Tribunal//VerfBlog.2022, 14 August. URL: https://verfassungsblog.de/extinguish-ing-the-court/ (дата обращения: 28.06.2025).
  30. 30. Solum L.B. Flourishing, Virtue, and Common Good Constitutionalism//Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. 2023. Vol.46. Iss. 3. Pp. 1149–1175.
  31. 31. Verheij B., Hage J.C., Van Den Herik H.J. An Integrated View on Rules and Principles//Artificial Intelligence and Law. 1998. Vol.6. Iss. 1. P. 13.
  32. 32. Vermeule A. Beyond Originalism//The Atlantic. URL:https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/com-mon-good-constitutionalism/609037/ (дата обращения:05.07.2025).
  33. 33. Vermeule A.Common Good Constitutionalism: Recovering the Classical Legal Tradition. Medford, 2022.
  34. 34. Winczorek P. Nowa Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Problem aksjologii//Przegląd Sejmowy. 1996. No. 4. Pp.9–19.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library