- PII
- S27130398S1026945225070021-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S2713039825070021
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue number 7
- Pages
- 16-23
- Abstract
- The article examines the problems of legality and its various interpretations in the history of modern political and legal thought in the countries of the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition. There are significant differences in the variety of different approaches to understanding the role of law, the legislation and legality in various national legal traditions. The problem of legality in the conditions of socialism was determined by certain obligatory ideological prerequisites, from the standpoint of which it was given the formal meaning of a legal regime. In the Anglo-Saxon legal area, interpretations that formalize the watershed between common law and so-called statutory law, i. e. acts adopted by legislative authorities, are widespread and still insufficiently mastered in a number of respects. For Anglo-Saxon law and related legal thought, the issue of legality is becoming increasingly relevant today in terms of the protection of rights and freedoms, as a condition for the inadmissibility of reducing the levels of legal protection and security guaranteed by common law. Understanding legality in this tradition means, first of all, analyzing the logic of judicial interpretation and attempts to build legal knowledge around and based on anthropological approaches. The idea and principle of legality in the context of the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition reveal a number of significant limitations related to understanding the role of law and rational legal construction in social practice.
- Keywords
- законность легитимность легальность правопонимание естественное право юридический позитивизм право и закон англосаксонская правовая мысль история политико-правовой мысли судебное толкование
- Date of publication
- 05.12.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 45
References
- 1. . Горбань В. С. Историография психологических теорий права // Вестник Московского ун-та. Сер. 11: Право. 2024. № 4. С. 79–104. DOI: 10.55959/ MSU0130-0113-11-65-4-5
- 2. 2. Горбань В. С. Понятие, теория и проблемы формирования общей концепции эффективности законодательства. М., 2009.
- 3. 3. Горбань В. С. Роль историографии в философии права и формировании понятийного языка современной правовой теории // Антиномии. 2025. Т. 25. № 1. С. 107– 127. DOI: 10.17506/26867206_2025_25_1_107
- 4. 4. Ковалев В. А. Буржуазная законность: теоретические иллюзии и судебно-п олицейская реальность. М., 1986.
- 5. 5. Лукашева Е. А. Правосознание и законность в социалистическом обществе (Идеол. и социально-п сихол. факторы обеспечения соц. законности): дис. … д-ра юрид. наук. М., 1972.
- 6. 6. Плигин В. Н. Проблема легитимности в современных политико-п равовых учениях: автореф. дис. … д-ра юрид. наук. М., 2021.
- 7. 7. Савенков А. Н. Новый технологический уклад и социогуманитарные вызовы // Государство и право. 2025. № 1. С. 14–36. DOI: 10.31857/S1026945225010017
- 8. 8. Фуллер Л. Мораль права / пер. с англ. Т. Даниловой. Изд. перераб. и доп. М., 2007.
- 9. 9. Chen B. The Principle of Legality: Protecting Statutory Rights from Statutory Infringement? (August 13, 2018) // Sydney Law Review. 2019. No. 41(1). Pp. 73–104.
- 10. 10. Doyle J., Wells B. How Far Can the Common Law Go towards Protecting Human Rights? // Alston Ph. (ed.). Promoting Human Rights through Bills of Rights: Comparative Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 1999. Pp. 13–18.
- 11. 11. Elliott M. Constitutional Legislation. Fundamental Rights and Article 50 // Elliott M. Public Law for Everyone (8 September 2016). URL: https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2016/09/08/ brexitconstitutional-legislationfundamental-rights-andarticle-50/
- 12. 12. Eskridge W. Jr., Frickey P. Quasi-C onstitutional Law: Clear Statement Rules as Constitutional Lawmaking // Vanderbilt Law Review. 1992. Vol. 45. Рp. 593–646.
- 13. 13. Geiringer C. The Principle of Legality and the Bill of Rights Act: A Critical Examination of ‘R v Hansen’ // New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law. 2008. No. 6(1). Pp. 59–88.
- 14. 14. Habermas J. W ie Ist Legitimität Durch Legalität Möglich? // Kritische Justiz. 1987. Vol. 20. No. 1. S. 1–16.
- 15. 15. Joseph P. The Principle of Legality: Constitutional Innovation // Dan Meagher and Matthew Groves (eds.). The Principle of Legality in Australia and New Zealand. Federation Press, 2017. Pp. 31–42.
- 16. 16. Manning J. Clear Statement Rules and the Constitution // Columbia Law Review. 2010. Vol. 110. Pp. 399–404.
- 17. 17. Meagher D. The Principle of Legality as Clear Statement Rule: Significance and Problems // Sydney Law. Review. 2014. No. 36(3). Pp. 413–443.
- 18. 18. Shapiro S. Legality. Harvard University Press, 2011.
- 19. 19. The Rule of law / ed. by R. P. Wolff. NY, 1971.
