- PII
- S27130398S1026945225060112-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S2713039825060112
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue number 6
- Pages
- 120-130
- Abstract
- The relations formed in social reality, the nature and basis of which are the connections of armed confrontation between states, are primary relations. These relations form and predetermine the character, content and essence of all other connections and relations, which constitute the essence of not the primary “military opposing matter”, but the essence of another, secondary matter, ensuring such confrontation. The connections of the primary matter, which are the relations of military confrontation, are the strongest, most significant, system forming. Within the framework of the relations of military conflict, contradictions between states are resolved. The essential and homogeneous connectedness of the relations and connections of the military conflict, their substantial concentration form the core of military conflicts in the system of military relations of society and the state, and the legal mediation of these relations and connections forms the core of Military Law - the law of military conflicts.The core of the branch of law is the systemic and structural basis for the independence of the branch in the legal system, acting at the same time as a system-forming factor of all social and legal processes in the systemic and legal formation - in the subject, method, structure of the branch of law. Nuclear processes in legal matter determine the formation of a system of nuclei: in the subject (in Civil Law - these are property relations; in Military Law - the systemic integrity of relations of military conflicts); in the structure of the branch - the core is the key element that determines and influences all legal processes in the branch of law (in Civil Law - this is the right of ownership; in Military Law - the law of military conflicts); in the method - this is a systemic set of means and methods of legal influence on social relations that constitute the subject of the branch, which is a re ection of objective nuclear processes in the branch of law. The core of the branch of law as a legal value is the third, in addition to the subject and method, criterion of branch formation in law, which has a systemic-structural nature. Commonalities of norms are formed in legal matter (secondary in relation to reality, primary matter). It is in the primary social matter that the processes of structuring of legal matter are laid. Nuclear processes in primary matter predetermine nuclear processes, the formation of the core of the branch of law in legal matter.
- Keywords
- ядро отрасли системно-структурное основание (критерий) военное право право военных конфликтов правовая материя
- Date of publication
- 01.06.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 8
References
- 1. Алексеев С. С. Собр. соч.: в 10 т. Т. 3. Проблемы теории права. М., 2010. С. 131-137.
- 2. Алексеев С. С. Структура советского права. М., 1975.
- 3. Блауберг И. В. Проблема целостности и системный подход. М., 1997. С. 308-326.
- 4. Военное право: в 3 т. / под общ. ред. А. Н. Савенкова, А. В. Кудашкина. М., 2021. Т. I. История и теория военного права (с предисловием). С. 381, 387, 388, 393, 394; т. II. Современное состояние военного права (институты военного права); 2022. т. III. Основные проблемы и перспективные направления военно--правовых исследований.
- 5. Каган М. С. Система и структура // Системные исследования. Методологические проблемы. М., 1983. С. 90, 93.
- 6. Кедров Б. М. Классификация наук. М., 1985. С. 359.
- 7. Керимов Д. А. Методология права. М., 2001. С. 258.
- 8. Керимов Д. А. Философские проблемы права. М., 1972. С. 41, 270-344.
- 9. Поддубный Н. В. Самоорганизующиеся системы: онтологический и методологический аспекты: автореф. дис. … д-ра филос. наук. Ростов н/Д., 2000.
- 10. Поддубный Н. В. Ядро системы: онтологический статус и гносеологическое значение понятия // Системный подход в современной науке (К 100 летию Людвига фон Берталанфи): сб. ст. / отв. ред.: И. К. Лисеев, В. Н. Садовский. М., 2004. С. 386-408.
- 11. Труды Военно--юридической академии. М., 1956. Т. XXIII. С. 40, 82.
- 12. Штейн Л. Учение о военном быте, как часть науки о государстве // Штейн Л. Соч. / пер. и предисл. А. Эртеля. Санкт--Петербург, 1875. С. 213.
- 13. Эртель А. Предисловие // Штейн Л. Учение о военном быте, как часть науки о государстве. В кн.: Штейн Л. Соч. / пер. и предисл. А. Эртеля. Санкт--Петербург, 1875. С. 2, 22-29.
- 14. Явич Л. С. Общая теория права. Л., 1976. С. 18-20, 125-139.
- 15. Яковлев В. Ф. Гражданско--правовой метод регулирования общественных отношений. М., 2022. С. 62, 65.
- 16. Яковлев В. Ф. Гражданско--правовой метод регулирования общественных отношений. Свердловск, 1972.
- 17. Stein L. Die Lehre vom Heerwesen: Als Theil der Staatswissenschaft. Stuttgart, 1872.
