Материально-правовая имплементация римского статута международного уголовного суда: сравнительный анализ опыта Германии и Нидерландов

Сафаров Низами А.

Главная>Выпуск №3>Материально-правовая имплементация римского статута международного уголовного суда: сравнительный анализ опыта Германии и Нидерландов

Оглавление

Аннотация Оценить Содержание публикации

Библиография Комментарии

Аннотация

Код статьи

S1026-94520000617-6-1

Тип публикации

Статья

Статус публикации

Опубликовано

Авторы

Сафаров Низами Абдуллаевич Связаться с автором

Выпуск

Выпуск №3

Страницы

77-86

Аннотация

в работе рассматривается материально-правовая имплементация Римского Статута Международного уголовного суда в аспекте правоприменительной практики Германии и Нидерландов.

Ключевые слова

Международный уголовный суд, международное уголовное право, универсальная юрисдикция, экстрадиция, геноцид, преступления против человечности, военные преступления, принцип дополнительности, передача лиц

Классификатор

Дата публикации

01.03.2012

Всего подписок

Всего просмотров

1049

Оценка читателей

0.0 (0 голосов)

Цитировать Скачать pdf Скачать JATS

ГОСТ	Сафаров Н. А. Материально-правовая имплементация римского статута международного уголовного суда: сравнительный анализ опыта Германии и Нидерландов // Государство и право. – 2012. – Выпуск №3 C. 77-86 .
MLA	Safarov, Nizami "Material`no-pravovaya implementaciya rimskogo statuta mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda: sravnitel`ny`j analiz opy`ta Germanii i Niderlandov." Gosudarstvo i pravo. 3 (2012).:77-86.
APA	Safarov N. (2012). Material`no-pravovaya implementaciya rimskogo statuta mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda: sravnitel`ny`j analiz opy`ta Germanii i Niderlandov. Gosudarstvo i pravo. no. 3, pp.77-86

Библиография

Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

1. An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure / R. Cryer, H. Friman, D. Robinson, E. Wilmshurst (eds.). Cambridge, 2010. P. 75, 76. 

2. Schabas W. The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute. Oxford, 2010. P. 269-276. 

3. Кодекс вступил в силу с 30 июня 2002 г. (см.: Werle G., Jessberger F. Volkerstrafrecht. Tubingen, 2007. P. 302). 

4. Kaul H-P. Germany: Methods and Techniques Used to Deal With Constitutional Sovereignty and Criminal Law Issues'// States' Responses to Issues Arising from the ICC Statute: Constitutional, Sovereignty, Judicial Cooperation and Criminal Law / Ed. by R.S. Lee. New York, 2005. P. 74, 75. 

5. Verweij H., Groenleer M.'The Netherlands' Legislative Measures to Implement the ICC Statute'// Ibid. P. 86. 

6. Boot-Matthijssen M., van Elst R. Key provisions of the International Crimes Act 2003 // Netherlands Yearbook of International Law. 2004. Vol. 35. P. 251-296. 

7. Piragopff D. Article 70 - Offences against the Administration of Justice'// Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article / О. Triffterer (ed.). Sec. ed. Baden-Baden, 2008. P. 1336, 1337. 

8. Schabas W. The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute. P. 852-858. 

9. Об имплементации Римского статута МУС в Европе см. подробнее: Goldmann M. Implementing the Rome Statute in Europe: From Sovereign Distinction to Convergence in International Law // Finnish Yearbook of International Law. 2005. Vol. 16. P. 5-29. 

10. Ibid. P. 253. 

11. Turns D. Aspects of National Implementation of the Rome Statute: The United Kingdom and Selected Other States'// The Permanent International Criminal Court / D. McGoldrick, Р. Rowe, Е. Donelly (eds). Oxford, 2004. P. 337-388. 

12. Bassiouni C. Introduction to International Criminal Law. Transnational Publishers. 2003; Knoops A. An Introduction to the Law of International Criminal Tribunals: A Comparative Study. New York, 2003. 

13. Young S. Surrendering the Accused to the International Criminal Court // BYIL. 2000. Vol. 71. P. 317. 

14. Swart B. Arrest and Surrender // The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary. Oxford, 2002. Vol. II. P. 1639-1704. 

15. Knoops A. Surrender to the International Criminal Courts: Contemporary Practise and Procedures. New York, 2002. P. 195-197. 

16. Тузмухамедов Б.Р. Римский статут Международного уголовного суда: возможные вопросы конституционности // Моск. журнал международного права. 2002. № 2. С. 165-173. 

17. Сафаров Н.А. Передача лиц Международному уголовному суду и институт экстрадиции: трудный компромисс // Там же. 2003. № 2. С. 165-173. 

18. Sluiter G. Surrender of War Criminals to the International Criminal Court // Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review. 2003. Vol. 25. № 2. P. 605-652. 

19. Kress C., Prost K. Article 89 - Surrender of persons to the Court'// Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article. P. 1537-1548. 

20. Schabas W. The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute. P. 1035-1050. 

21. Stahn C. Arrest and Surrender Under the ICC Statute: a Contextual Reading // Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice / Ed. by C. Stahn. The Hague, 2010. P. 659-686. 

22. Wilкitzki P. The German Law on Co-operation with ICC // International Criminal Law Review. 2002. Vol. 2. N 2. P. 195- 212. 

23. Jarasch F., Kress C. The Rome Statute and the German Legal Order// Kress C., Lattanzi F. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and Domestic Legal Orders. Vol. 1. General Aspects and Constitutional Issues. Ripa Fagnano Alto / Baden-Baden. 2000. P. 91-112. 

24. Кресс К. Ратификация и имплементация Статута Международного уголовного суда в Германии // Международный уголовный суд: ратификация и имплементация на национальном уровне. Материалы международной конференции. М., 2001. С. 108-115. 

25. Werle G. Das Volkerstrafgesetzbuch // Juristenzeitung. 2002. Vol. 57. № 15/16. S. 725-734. 

26. Zimmermann A. Auf dem Weg zu einem deuttschen Volkerstrafgesetzbuch: Entstehung, volkerrechtlicher Rahmen und wesentliche Inhalte // Zeitdeutsohen fur Rechtpolitik. 2002. Vol. 35. № 3. S. 97-102. 

27. Manacorda S., Werle G. L'adaptation des systemes penaux nationaux au Statut de Rome: Le paradigme du "Volkerstrafgesetzbuch" allemande // Revue de science criminelle et de droit penal compare. 2003. № 3. P. 501-515. 

28. Alonso H. Current Trends on Modes of Liability for Genocide, Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes// Future Perspectives of International Criminal Justice / C. Stahn, L. van den Herik (eds.). The Hague, 2010. P. 520-544. 

29. Kleffner K. The Impact of Complementarity on National Implementation of Substantive International Criminal Law // Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2003. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 86-113. 

30. Сафаров Н.А. Преступления, подпадающие под юрисдикцию Международного уголовного суда, и уголовное законодательство стран СНГ (Сравнительный анализ) // Гос. и право. 2004. № 4. С. 48-60. 

31. Schabas W. The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute. P. 335-352. 

32. Razesberger F. The International Criminal Court: the principle of complementarity. Berlin, 2006; Stigen J. The Relationship between the International Criminal Court and National Jurisdictions: The Principle of Complementarity. Dodrecht, 2008. 

33. El Zeidy M. The Principle of Complementarity in International Criminal Law: Origin, Development and Practice. The Hague, 2008. 

34. Cassese A. The Statute of the International Criminal Court: Some Preliminary Refl ections // European Journal of International Law. 1999. Vol. 10. № 1. P. 158, 159. 

35. Broomhall B. International Justice and the International Criminal Law: Between Sovereignty and the Rule of Law. Oxford. 2003. P. 86-93. 

36. Bergsmo M., Triffterer O. Preamble // Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article. P. 1-14. 

37. Schabas W. The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute. P. 29-56. 

38. Jesberger F. 'International v. National Prosecution of International Crimes'// The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice / A. Cassese (ed.). Oxford, 2009. P. 208-215. 

39. Kaul H-P. The International Criminal Court - Its Relationship to Domestic Jurisdiction // The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court. Leiden, 2009. P. 31-39. 

40. Lattanzi F. 'Concurrent Jurisdictions between Primacy and Complementarity'// International Criminal Justice: Law and Practice from the Rome Statute to its Review. 2010. P. 181-209. 

41. О дополнительности см.: Bartram B. Primacy or Complementarity: Reconciling the Jurisdiction of National Courts and International Tribunals // The Yale Journal of International Law. 1998. Vol. 23. № 2. P. 383-436. 

42. Cassese A. International Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford, 2002. P. 348-352. 

43. Williams S., Schabas W. Article 17 - Issues of Admissibility// Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Obsrevers Notes, Article by Article. P. 605-626. 

44. The International Criminal Court: the Making of the Rome Statute - Issues, Negotiations, Results / by R.S. Lee (ed.). The Hague; Boston, 1999. P. 41-78. 

45. Refl ections on the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Adrian Bos / Ed. by Herman A.M. von Hebel, J.G. Lammers, J. Schukking. The Hague, 1999. P. 57-77. 

46. Arsanjani M. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court // American Journal of International Law. 1999. Vol. 93. № 1. P. 27, 28. 

47. Holmes J. Complementarity: National Courts versus the ICC // The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary. P. 667, 668. 

48. Kleffner J. Complementarity in the Rome Statute and National Criminal Jurisdictions. Oxford, 2008. 

49. Werle G. Principles of International Criminal Law. The Hague, 2009. P. 74, 75. 

50. Werle G. Volkerstrafrecht. Berlin, 2007. P. 302. 

51. Werle G. Principles of International Criminal Law. Р. 83, 84. 

52. Sluiter G. Implementation of the ICC Statute in the Dutch Legal Order // Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2004. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 158-178. 

53. Boot-Matthijssen M., van Elst R. Op. cit. P. 254. 

54. Bijl. Hand. II 2001/2002. 28337. № 3. (Explanatory Memorandum). P. 4 // Netherlands Yearbook of International Law. 2003. Vol. 34. P. 235. 

55. Segall A. Punishment of War Crimes at the National Level: Obligations under International Humanitarian Law and the Complementarity Principle Established by the International Criminal Court// National Codes on International Crimes National Approaches to the Implementation of International Criminal Law in Domestic Law / М. Neuner (ed.). Berlin, 2003. P. 257-271. 

56. Об элементах преступлений см. в частности: International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and the Rules of Procedure and Evidence / By Roy S. K. Lee, Roy S. Lee, Hakan Friman. New York, 2001; Dormann K. Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary. Cambridge, 2003. 

57. Verweij H., Groenleer M. The Netherlands' Legislative Measures to Implement the ICC Statute // States' Responses to Issues Arising from the ICC Statute: Constitutional, Sovereignty, Judicial Cooperation and Criminal Law. P. 92, 93. 

58. Hecker B. Europaisches Strafrecht. Heidelberg., 2010. S. 68-71. 

59. Werle G..Volkerstrafrecht. P. 308. 

60. Schabas W. General Principles of Criminal Law in the International Criminal Court Statute (Part III) // European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice. 1998. Vol. 6. № 4. P. 84-112. 

61. Ambos K. General Principles of Criminal Law in the Rome Statute// Criminal Law Forum. 1999. Vol. 10. № 1. P. 1-32. 

62. Saland P. International Criminal Law Principles // The International Criminal Court: the Making of the Rome Statute, Issues, Negotiations, Results. P. 189-216. 

63. Wirth S. Germany's New International Crimes Code: Bringing a Case to Court // Journal of International Criminal Justice. Vol. 1. № 1. 2002. P. 153. 

64. Satzger H. International and European Law. Baden-Baden, 2011. 

65. Reydams L. Universal Jurisdiction - International and National Legal Perspectives. Oxford, 2003. P. 144-147. 

66. Jessberger F. Universelle Strafgerichtsbarkeit zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit - oder: Warum man sich in Karlsruhe fur Donald Rumsfeld (nicht) interessiert // Die Vereinten Nationen sechs Jahrzehnte nach ihrer Grundung: Bilanz und Reformperspektiven / H. Munk (Hrsg.). Berlin, 2008. S. 58. 

67. Randall K. Universal Jurisdiction Under International Law // Texas Law Review. 1988. Vol. 66. № 4. P. 785-778. 

68. Van Den Vyer J. Universal Jurisdiction in International Criminal Law // South African Yearbook of International Law. 1999. Vol. 24. P. 107-132. 

69. Bassiouni C. Universal Jurisdiction for International Crimes: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Practice // Virginia Journal of International Law. 2001. Vol. 42. № 1. P. 81-162. 

70. Butler H. The Doctrine of Universal Jurisdiction: A Review of the Literature // Criminal Law Forum. 2000. Vol. 11. № 3. P. 353-373. 

71. Shaw M. International Law. Cambridge, 2003. P. 592-597. 

72. Принстонский проект универсальной юрисдикции был разработан при спонсорстве Принстонского университета (США) под руководством проф. С. Мачедо, возглавлявшего программы по праву Принстонского университета. 

73. The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction. Princeton. New Jersey, 2001. P. 28. 

74. Universal Jurisdiction and the Prosecurion of Serious Crimes Under International Law. Pennsivanis, 2004. P. 18-38. 

75. Inazumi M. Universal Jurisdiction in Modern International Law. Utrecht, 2005. P. 26. 

76. http: // www.idi-iil.org/idiE/resolutionsE/2005_kra_03_ en.pdf См. подробнее: Kress С. Universal Jurisdiction over International Crimes and the Institute de droit International // Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2006. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 561-585. 

77. Pita J.C. Schimmelpenninck van der Oije. A Surinam Crime Before a Dutch Court: Post-Colonial Injustice or Universal Jurisdiction? // Leiden Journal of International Law. 2001. Vol. 14. P. 455-476. 

78. Reydams L. Universal Jurisdiction: International and Municipal Legal Perspectives. P. 173. 

79. Reydams L. Universal Jurisdiction: International and Municipal Legal Perspectives. P. 167-169. 

80. Kamminga M. First Conviction Under the Universal Jurisdiction Provisions of the UN Convention Against Torture: Rotterdam District Court, 7 Aprel 2004. 

81. Sebastien N. // Netherlands International Law Review. 2004. Vol. 51. № 3. P. 439-449. 

82. О применении универсальной юрисдикции судебными органами Нидерландов см. также: Mettraux G. Dutch Courts Universal Jurisdiction over Violations of Common Article 3qua war Crimes // Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2006. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 362-371. 

83. Van Sliedregt E. International Crimes before Dutch Courts: Recent Developments // Leiden Journals of International Law. 2007. Vol. 20. P. 895-908. 

84. La Haye E. War Crimes in Internal Armed Confl icts. Cambridge, 2008. P. 289. 

85. Van den Herik L. A Quest jurisdiction and an Appropriate Defi nition of Crime: Mpambara Before Dutch Courts // Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2009. Vol. 7. № 5. P. 1117-1132. 

86. Ferdinandusse W. The Prosecution of Grave Breaches in National Courts // Ibid. P. 723-741. 

87. Wirth S. International Criminal Law in Germany Case Law and Legislation // Presentation to the Conference Combating International Crimes Domestically (3rd Annual War Crimes Conference, Ottawa, 22-23 April 2002). 

88. Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Eds. Sandoz, С. Swinarsk, В. Zimmermann). Geneva, 1987. 

89. Van Elst R. Implementing Universal Jurisdiction Over Grave Breaches of the Geneva Conventions // Leiden Journal of International Law. 2000. Vol. 13. № 4. P. 815-854. 

90. Brems E. Universal Criminal Jurisdiction for Grave Breaches of International Humanitarian Law // Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law. 2002. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 909-952. 

91. Vandermeersch D. La Repression en Droit Belge des Crimes de Droit Internationa l// Repression Nationale de Violations du Droit Internationale Humanitaire. Reunion d'Experts. Jeneva, 1997. P. 145-184. 

92. Reydams L. Universal Criminal Jurisdiction: The Belgian State Affairs // Criminal Law Forum. 2000. Vol. 11. № 2. P. 183-216. 

93. Reydams L. Prosecuting Crimes Under International Law on the Basis of Universal Jurisdiction: The Experience of Belgium // International and National Prosecution of Crimes Under International Law. Current Developments / Н. Fischer, С. Kress, S. Luder (eds). Berlin, 2001. P. 799-801. 

94. Ongena T. Universal Jurisdiction for International Core Crimes Resent Developments in Belgium // Leiden Journal of International Law. 2002. Vol. 15. № 3. P. 687-701. 

95. Walleyn L. Universal Jurisdiction: Lessons from the Belgian Experience // Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law. 2002. Vol. 5. P. 394-406. 

96. Bijl. Hand. II 2001/2002. 28337, № 3. P. 2. // Netherlands Yearbook of International Law. 2003. P. 233. 

97. Macedo S. Universal Jurisdiction: National Courts and the Prosecution of Serious Crimes Under International Law. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003. 

98. OLG Dusseldorf, 26 Sept. 1997. 

99. О судебной практике ФРГ по геноциду и военным преступлениям: Ambos K., Wirth S. Genocide and War Crimes in the Former Yugoslavia Before German Criminal Courts // International and National Prosecution of Crimes Under International Law. P. 769-798. 

100. Graditzky T. Individual Criminal Responsibility for Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in Non-International Armed Confl icts // International Review of the Red Cross. 1998. № 322. P. 29-56. 

101. National Measures to Repress Violations of International Humanitarian Law (Civil Law Systems). Report on the Meeting of Experts. Geneva. 23-25 Sept. 1997. P. 197-215. 

102. Швейцария ратифицировала Конвенцию в декабре 1999 г. 

103. Reydams L. Nyonteze v. Public Prosecutor // American Journal of International Law. 2002. Vol. 96. № 1. P. 236. 

104. Gottier M. What Relations Between the Exercise of Universal and Territorial Jurisdiction? The Decision of 13 December 2000 of the Spanish National Court Shelving the Proceedings Against Guatemalan Nationals Accused of Genocide // International and National Prosecution of Crimes Under International Law: Current Developments. P. 843-858. 

105. Gaeta P. War Crimes Trials Before Italian Criminal Courts: New Trends // Ibid. P. 752-769.

Библиография

Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

Комментарии

Войти через