Везде
CONFLICT INTERACTION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF PARTY DISPOSITION AND COURT DECISION OBLIGATORINESS IN A CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
CONFLICT INTERACTION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF PARTY DISPOSITION AND COURT DECISION OBLIGATORINESS IN A CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000617-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Evgeniia Kurzinski-Singer  Natal'ya Pankevich
Edition
Issue 9
Pages
36-46
Abstract
The article is devoted to the legal principles of the present Russian civil court procedure law, its evolution and transformation. It is shown that the current Russian law of civil court procedure presents a synthesis of contradicting inherited and newly introduced legal principles and practices and is determined by the effect of legal principles collision, namely of party disposition (which is a newly introduced legal principle) and the legal effect of court decision (which was inherited from the soviet law).
Keywords
civil court procedure law, principle of party disposition, legal effect of court decision, transition, soviet law
Date of publication
01.09.2010
Number of purchasers
2
Views
1105
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Konstitutsiya RF 1993 g. st. 17.
 2. Podobnyj ehffekt opisan: Teubner G. Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends up in New Divergences // The modern Law Review. 1998. Vol. 61. R. 11-32.  
 3. Klejnman A.F. Sovetskij grazhdanskij protsess. S. 56-57.  
 4. Dekret VTsIK O narodnom sude RSFSR ot 30 noyabrya 1918 g. st. 53.  
 5. Polozhenie o Narodnom sude RSFSR (Dekret VTsIK) ot 21 oktyabrya 1920 g. st. 53.  
 6. Voronov A. F. Grazhdanskij protsess: ehvolyutsiya dispozitivnosti. M., 2007. S. 69-70.     
 7. GPK RSFSF 1923 g. st. 2 // GPK RSFSR s postatejno sistematizirovannymi materialami / Sost. S.V. Aleksandrovskij i V.N. Lebedev. M., 1928. S. 3.  
 8. punkt 2 st. 4 GPK RSFSR 1964 g.  
 9. GPK RSFSR 1964 g.
 10. Bonner A.T. Printsip dispozitivnosti sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava. M., 1987. S. 44-45.  
 11. Leipold D. Zivilprozessrecht und Ideologie // Juristenzeitung. 1982. S. 441-448.  
 12. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 14 fevralya 2002 g.;  
 13. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda ot 16 iyulya 2004 g.  
 14. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 4 aprelya 2006 g.  
 15. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 6 dekabrya 2001 g.;  
 16. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 13 iyunya 2002 g.  
 17. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 6 dekabrya 2001 g.  
 18. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 13 iyunya 2002 g.  
 19. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 6 dekabrya 2001 g.  
 20. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 16 iyulya 2004 g.  
 21. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 13 iyunya 2002 g.;  
 22. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 25 yanvarya 2001 g.  
 23. Reshenie FAS Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 25 iyunya 2007 g.  
 24. Resheniya FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 17 marta 2006 g.; ot 22 maya 2006 g.;  
 25. Reshenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 20 aprelya 2007 g.  
 26. Sakhnova T.V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa. M., 2008. S. 455.     
 27. Resheniya FAS Ural'skogo okruga ot 12 oktyabrya 2005 g., FAS Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 19 dekabrya 2006 g.  
 28. Jauernig O. Zivilprozessrecht, 29. Aufl. M'nchen, 2007.  
 29. Schack H., Drittwirkung der RechtskraftNJW 1988, 865 ff.  
 30. Jauernig O., § 63 II. S. 201.  
 31. Jauernig O., § 63 III. S. 203.  
 32. Gemmel B., Maier Ch. Das russische Gerichtssystem aus der Wirtschaftsperspektive // Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft. 2009. 208 (215).  
 33. Shvarts M.Z. K voprosu o predelakh obyazatel'nosti vstupivshikh v zakonnuyu silu sudebnykh aktov // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. 2009. № 1. S. 84 i sl.     
 34. tam zhe. S. 84-97.  
 35. Shvarts M.Z. K voprosu o predelakh obyazatel'nosti vstupivshikh v zakonnuyu silu sudebnykh aktov // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. 2009. № 3. S. 88     
 36. FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 21 iyunya 2004 g.  
 37. FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 19 dekabrya 2001 g.  
 38. VAS RF ot 14 oktyabrya 2008 g. // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda. 2009. № 1. S. 192  
 39. FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 19 aprelya 2007 g.  
 40. postanovlenie Prezidiuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda ot 20 avgusta 2002 g.  
 41. postanovleniya FAS Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 4 oktyabrya 2005 g.; Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 9 yanvarya 2006 g.; Ural'skogo okruga ot 3 marta 2000 g.; Ural'skogo okruga ot 19 oktyabrya 2004 g.  
 42. postanovleniya FAS Ural'skogo okruga ot 14 sentyabrya 2006 g.; ot 30 avgusta 2006 g.  
 43. postanovlenie FAS Ural'skogo okruga ot 19 iyulya 2006 g.  
 44. Resheniya FAS Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 15 yanvarya 2009 g. i ot 16 iyulya 2008 g.;  
 45. FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 5 noyabrya 2008 g.;  
 46. FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 5 noyabrya 2008 g.;  
 47. FAS Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 16 avgusta 2000 g.  
 48. Resheniya FAS Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 15 yanvarya 2009 g.  
 49. Resheniya FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 12 avgusta 2004 g.;  
 50. FAS Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 28 noyabrya 2006 g.  
 51. Shvarts M.Z. K voprosu o predelakh obyazatel'nosti vstupivshikh v zakonnuyu silu sudebnykh aktov // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. 2009. № 1. S. 84.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate