References

Additional sources and materials

1. Kolesnikov E.V. Rets. na kn.: Zagajnov S.K. Sudebnyj pretsedent. Problemy pravoprimeneniya. M., 2002 // Pravovedenie. 2003. № 2 (247). S. 263. 
 
 2. Rozhkova M.A. Sudebnyj pretsedent i sudebnaya praktika // Iski i sudebnye resheniya. Sb. statej. M., 2008. S. 179. 
 
 3. Svod zakonov SShA. 28 U.S.C. Par. 1253 // http: // www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28 
 
 4. Op. cit. Par. 1257. 
 
 5. Op. cit. Par. 1254. 
 
 6. Lumbard J.E. Current Problems of the Federal Courts of Appeals // Cornell Law Review. Vol. 54. 1968. P. 29. 
 
 7. Songer D. "The Circuit Courts of Appeals" in: The American Courts: A Critical Assessment / Ed. by J.B. Gates and S.A. Johnson. Washington, 1991. P. 47. 
 
 8. Arbitrazhnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federatsii ot 24 iyulya 2002 g. (v red. ot 27 iyulya 2010 g. s izm. i dop.). St. 286. 
 
 9. Grazhdanskij protsessual'nyj kodeks RF ot 14 noyabrya 2002 g. (red. ot 23 dekabrya 2010 g.). St. 387. 
 
 10. Hettinger V.A., Lindquist S.A., Martinek W.L. Judging on a Collegial Court. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press. 2007. P. 12. 
 
 11. Songer D. Op. cit. P. 47. 
 
 12. David R. Zhoffre-Spinozi K. Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti. M., 1998. S. 301. 
 
 13. Healy T. Stare Decisis as a Constitutional Requirement // West Virginia Law Review. 2001. Vol. 104. P. 43. 
 
 14. United States v. IBM Corp., 517 U.S. 843, 856 (1996) // http: // www.supreme.justia.com 
 
 15. Horn v. United States, 524 U.S. 236 (1998) // Ibid. 
 
 16. Douglas W.O. Stare Decisis // Columbia Law Review, 735. 1949. P. 49. 
 
 17. Sloan A.H. A Government of Laws and Not Men: Prohibiting Non-Precedential Opinions by Statute or Procedural Rule // Indiana Law Journal. Vol. 79. 2004. P. 733. 
 
 18. Bageanis v. Am. Bankers Life Assurance Co., 783 F. Supp. 1141, 1149 (N.D.Ill.1992) // http: // www.supreme. justia.com 
 
 19. Caminker E. Why Must Inferior Courts Obey Superior Court Precedents? // Stanford Law Review. Vol. 817. 1994. P. 46. 
 
 20. Dobbins J.C. Structure and Precedent // Michigan Law Review. Vol. 108. 2010. P. 1461. 
 
 21. Solum Lawrence D. Stare Decisis, Law of the Case, and Judicial Estoppel // 18 Moore's Federal Practice. 3d ed. 2009. Para. 134.02 [1] [b]-[c]. 
 
 22. Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 63 (1996) // http: // www.justia.com 
 
 23. Vu v. Ortho-McNeil Pharm., Inc., 602 F. Supp. 2d. 1151, 1154-1155 (N.D. Cal. 2009) // http: // bulk.resource.org 
 
 24. United States v. Sirotina, 318 F. Supp. 2d 43, 47 (E.D.N.Y. 2004) // Ibid. 
 
 25. Klein D.E. Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals. Cambridge, 2002. P. 71, 72. 
 
 26. Surrency Erwin C. History of the Federal Courts. 2d ed. 2002. R. 70-72. 
 
 27. The Judiciary Act of 1789. P.1 // http: // www.constitution.org/uslaw/judiciary_1789.htm 
 
 28. Circuit Judges Act of 1869, 16 Stat. 44 (1869) // http: // www.fjc.gov.history/home.nsf/page/10b 
 
 29. Evarts Act of 1891, 26 Stat. 826 (1891) // http: // www.fjc.gov.history/home.nsf/page/12b 
 
 30. The Judicial Code of 1911, 36 Stat. 1087, 1167 (1911) // http: // www.fjc.gov.history /home.nsf/page/13b 
 
 31. Surrency Erwin C. History of the Federal Courts. P. 90, 91. 
 
 32. Moore v. United States, 157 F. 2d 760, 764 (9th Cir. 1946) // http: // www.law.cornell.edu 
 
 33. Michael E Solimine. Ideology and En Banc Review / North Carolina Law Review. Vol. 67. 1988. P. 36, 37 // http: //litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com 
 
 34. Mead R.A. "Unpublished" Opinions as the Bulk of the Iceberg: Publication Patterns in the Eighth and Tenth Circuits of the United States Courts of Appeals // Law Library Journal. Vol. 93. 2001. P. 589 // http: // www.aallnet.com 
 
 35. Dobbins J.C. Structure and Precedent. P. 1488.