References

1. 1. Baranovsky V., Mateiko A. (2016) Responsibility to Protect: Russia’s Approaches. The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 51, issue 2, pp. 49–69.
2. 2. Boycko M., Shleifer A., Vishny R. (1995) Privatizing Russia. Cambridge (MA) and London: The MIT Press.
3. 3. Brubaker R. (1996) Nationalism reframed: nationhood and the national question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
4. 4. Gaydar E.T. (2006) Gibel’ imperii: uroki dlya sovremennoy Rossii [The demise of the empire: lessons for modern Russia]. Moscow: ROSSPEN.
5. 5. Gerasimenko D.S. (2016) Doktrina R2P v mizhderzhavnih vidnosinah: vid podiy v Gruzi do Krimu [The doctrine of “R2P” in the foreign wings: from the west to Georgia to the Crima]. Molodiy vcheniy, no. 2(29), pp. 188–193.
6. 6. Granin YU.D. (2011) Stanet li Rossiya nacionalnim gosudarstvom? [Will Russia become a “national state”?]. Voprosi filosofii, no. 1, pp. 15–27.
7. 7. Harasymiw B. (2002) Post-Communist Ukraine. Edmonton and Toronto: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press.
8. 8. Korostelina K.V. (2014) Constructing the narratives of identity and power: Self-imagination in a young Ukrainian nation. Lanham (MA): Lexington.
9. 9. Kostomarov N. (1861) Dve russkie narodnosti [Two Russian nationalities]. Osnova, no. 3, pp. 33–80.
10. 10. Kuzio T. (1998) Ukraine: State and Nation Building. London and New York: Routledge.
11. 11. Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? (1990) Ed. by Williamson J. Washington: Institute for International Economics.
12. 12. McCormick J.P. (2008) Machiavellian Democracy: Controlling Elites with Ferocious Populism. American Political Science Review, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 297–313.
13. 13. Merton R.K. (1995) The Thomas Theorem and the Matthew Effect. Social Forces, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 379–424.
14. 14. Mezhuev V.M. (1992) Ideya nacionalnogo gosudarstva v istoricheskoy perspektive [The Idea of the National State in Historical Perspective]. POLIS, no. 5–6, pp. 10–16.
15. 15. Oleynik A.N. (2012) Kto eti muzhchini i zhenschini na fotografii? Kontent-analiz fotografiy massovih protestov [Who are these men and women in the photo? Content analysis of photos of mass protests]. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya: Dannie. Analiz. Diskussii, no. 2, pp. 87–102.
16. 16. Oleynik A.N.(2015) Konflikt formalnih institutov i chelovecheskogo kak istochnik politicheskogo cinizma [Conflict of formal institutions and “human” as a source of political cynicism]. Politicheskaya konceptologiya: Zhurnal metadisciplinarnih issledovaniy, no. 2, pp. 178–190.
17. 17. Pain E., Prostakov S. (2016) Entoni Smit (1939–2016) i ego nauchnoe zaveschanie. Nekrolog [Anthony Smith (1939–2016) and his scientific testament. Obituary]. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie, no. 15(3), pp. 255–260.
18. 18. Pain E., Fedyunin S. (2017) O metodologicheskoy perezagruzke teorii nacii [On the methodological reset of the theory of the nation]. Gefter.Ru. 2017 (http://gefter.ru/archive/22113).
19. 19. Pastuhov V.B. (2000) Nacionalniy i gosudarstvenniy interesi Rossii: igra slov ili igra v slova? [National and State Interests of Russia: Playing Words or Playing Words?]. POLIS, no. 1, pp. 95–96.
20. 20. Peregudov S.P. (2011) Nacionalno-gosudarstvennaya identichnost i problemi konsolidacii rossiyskogo gosudarstva [National-State Identity and the Problems of the Consolidation of the Russian State]. POLIS, no. 3, pp. 141–163.
21. 21. Reformaciya: Uspih vropi i shans dlya Ukrani (2017) [Reformation: success for Europe and a chance for Ukraine]. Za redakciyu Sheremeti R.M., Romanenko O. Kiv: Sammit-Knig.
22. 22. Rustow D.A. (1970) Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model. Comparative Politics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 337–363.
23. 23. Salnikov V.P., Romanovskaya V.B., Salnikov M.V., Romanovskaya L.A. (2015) Russkiy povorot v politiko-pravovom diskurse [“The Russian turn” in the political and legal discourse]. Uchenie zapiski yuridicheskogo fakulteta Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, no. 38(48), pp. 192–198.
24. 24. Sloterdayk P. (2009) Kritika cinicheskogo razuma [Criticism of Cynical Reason]. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya, Moscow: ACT.
25. 25. Smith A.D. (1991) National Identity. London: Penguin Books.
26. 26. Smith A.D. (2002) When is a Nation? Geopolitics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 5–32.
27. 27. Smith A.D. (2004) The Antiquity of Nations. Cambridge: Polity.
28. 28. Suslov M. (2012) Geographical Metanarratives in Russia and the European East: Contemporary Pan-Slavism. Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 53, no. 5. pp. 575–595.
29. 29. Tishkov V.A. (2013) Rossiyskiy narod: istoriya i smisl nacionalnogo samosoznaniya [The Russian people: the history and meaning of national identity]. Moscow: Nauka.
30. 30. Veblen T. (1939) Imperial Germany and Industrial Revolution. New York: The Viking Press.
31. 31. Warner R.M. (2013) Applied Statistics: From Bivariate to Multivariate Techniques. Los Angeles: Sage.
32. 32. Yakovenko I.G. (1996) Ot imperii k nacionalnomu gosudarstvu (Popitka konceptualizacii processa) [From the Empire to the National State (An attempt to conceptualize the process)]. POLIS, no. 6, pp. 117–128.
33. 33. Yan E. (2000) Gosudarstvennoe i etnicheskoe ponimanie nacii: protivorechiya i shodstvo [The State and Ethnic Understanding of the Nation: Contradictions and Similarities]. POLIS, no. 1, pp. 114–123.