Плоды социального либерализма и некоторые причины устойчивости выбора неэффективных стратегий
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Плоды социального либерализма и некоторые причины устойчивости выбора неэффективных стратегий
Annotation
PII
S086904990000617-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
61-74
Abstract
The authors support restriction of functions of state by the defense and the maintenance of order.They criticize the combination of social doctrines with the ideas of liberalism. In their view the socialdoctrines distort liberal ideas and create serious problems in the functioning of modern states.
Keywords
liberalism, social liberalism, social idea, the effectiveness of public policy
Date of publication
19.11.2013
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1098
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Dal' R. O demokratii. M., 2000.
Lal D. Neprednamerennye posledstviya. M., 2007.
Institutsional'nye ogranicheniya sovremennogo ehkonomicheskogo rosta. M., 2011.
Mizes L. Byurokratiya. Nezaplanirovannyj khaos. Antikapitalisticheskaya mental'nost'. M., 1993.
Mizes L. Sotsializm. Ehkonomicheskij i sotsiologicheskij analiz. M., 1994.
Rubinshtejn A.Ya. Sotsial'nyj liberalizm: k voprosu ehkonomicheskoj metodologii // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2012. № 6.
Spenser G. Lichnost' i gosudarstvo. M., 2006.
Tilli Ch. Demokratiya. M., 2007.
Fridman M., Fridman R. Svoboda vybirat'. M., 2007.
Yanovskij K.Eh., Zatkovetskij I. Paradoksy gosudarstva nalogoplatel'schika // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2013. № 3.
Downs A. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, 1957.
Feiglin M. Why are They Committing Suicide? (http:/www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/665186/posts).
Fox (Senate Minority Leader Mitchell McConnel Interview)
(http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/special-report-bret-baier/videos#p/86927/v/1689976097001 2012).
Hamowy R. Governmant and Public Health in America // Edward Elgar Rublishing. July 30,  2008.
Hillman A.L. Expressive Behavior in Economics and Politics // European Journal of Political Economy. 2010.
Hillyer Quin an Examiner Editorial Special Report: Trial lawyers’ Lobbyists Seeking Special Favors from Congress February 18, 2009 (http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/104030).
Hoppe H. The Case for Free Trade and Restricted Immigration // Journal of Libertarian Studies. 1998. Vol. 13. № 2.
Kessler D., McClellan M. Do Doctors Practice Defensive Medicine? // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1996. Vol. 111. № 2.
Meese III E., Spakovsky H.A. von. The Trial Lawyers‘ Earmark: Using Medicare to Finance the Lifestyles of the Rich and Infamous. Heritage’s Center for legal and Judicial Studies, Legal Memorandum № 47 August 28, 2009 (http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2009/08/the-triallawyers-earmark-using-medicare-to-fi nance-the-lifestyles-of-the-rich-and-infamous).
Meotti G. Exposé: Islamic Apartheid in Europe. January 9, 2013 (http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/12705).
Niskanen W. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago, 1971.
Przeworski A., Alvarez M.E., Cheibub J.A. et al. Democracy and Development. Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World 1950–1990. Cambridge, 2000.
Rosenzweig P. The Over-Criminalization of Social and Economic Conduct. Heritage Foundation. Legal Memorandum. № 7. April 17, 2003 (http://www.heritage.org/Research/LegalIssues/lm7.cfm).
Seeman N. Taking Judicial Activism Seriously // Fraser Forum. August, 2003.
Stigler G.J. The Theory of Economic Regulation // Bell Journal of Economics and Management. Science 2. 1971. Spring. № 1.
Viscusi W.K. Economic Foundations of the Current Regulatory Reform Efforts // The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1996. Vol. 10. № 3.
Viscusi W.K. Mortality Effects of Regulatory Costs and Policy Evaluation Criteria // The RAND Journal of Economics. 1994. Vol. 25. № 1.
Viscusi W.K., Hamilton J.T. Are Risk Regulators Rational? Evidence from Hazardous Waste Cleanup Decisions // The American Economic Review. 1999. Vol. 89. № 4.
Walsh B.W., Joslyn T.M. Without Intent: How Congress is Eroding the Criminal Intent Requirement in Federal Law. The Heritage Foundation. National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, 2010 (http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2010/pdf/WithoutIntent_lo-res.pdf#page=11).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate