Везде
HOW CONFUCIANISM MANAGED TO DISPLACED MOISM TEACHING IN MODERN CHINA
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
HOW CONFUCIANISM MANAGED TO DISPLACED MOISM TEACHING IN MODERN CHINA
Annotation
PII
S0321-50750000616-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Artem Goncharuk 
Edition
Issue №7
Pages
16-20
Abstract
The article analyses the political structure of ancient China and explores the main reasons for emerging of new teaching branches such as Confucianism and Moism. The article reviews the basic ideas of both teachings and determines theirs connection with the political system of the period. The research goes through a historical path of Confucianism development and analyses its current status as a basic semi-religious and ethical teaching within China and brand-image of the country in overseas regions. The cross-parallel comparison with Moism teaching is conducted and comparison with the key-ideas of Socialism teaching is made.
Keywords
China, Confucianism, Moism, Socialism
Date of publication
01.07.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1374
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Kuzyk B.N., Titarenko M.L. Rossiya-2050, strategiya innovatsionnogo proryva. M., Institut ehkonomicheskikh strategij. 2006. (Kuzyk B.N., Titarenko M.L. 2006. Russia-2050, Srategy of an innovation breakthrough. M.) (in Russian) 
 2. Yang Chaoming. Kongzi (Konfutsij) // Kongzi jiayu tongjie, 1991, r. 17
 3. Plekhanov G.V. K voprosu o roli lichnosti v istorii. M., Gospolitizdat, 1956. (Plehanov G.V. 1956. The issue of a person's influence on history. M.) (in Russian)
 4. Wang Xue. MoZi zhexuejia sixiang (Filosofskaya mysl' Motszy) // MoZi. 2001, r. 100-101.
 5. Wang Hao. Zhongguo Zhexuejia (Filosofiya Kitaya) // Zhongguo gaikuang. 2004, p. 75-77. 
 6. Malyavin V.V. Dinastiya Min. M., 2001, s. 11. (Malyavin V.V. 2001. Ming Dinasty. M.) (in Russian) 
 7. Fan Jinmin. Shehui cengci (Sloi obschestva) // Zhongguo gudaishi. 2007, p 15-17. 
 8. Malyavin V.V. Konfutsij. M., 1997, s. 111 (Malyavin V.V. 1997. Confucius. M.) (in Russian) 
 9. Perelomov L.S. Lun'yuj. M., 2001. Gl. 12 (11). (Perelomov L.S. 2001. Lunyu. M.) (in Russian) 
 10. Go Mozho. Ehpokha rabovladel'cheskogo stroya. M., 1956. 
 11. Titarenko M.L. Drevnekitajskij filosof MoDi, ego shkola i uchenie. M., Nauka, 1985. (Titarenko M.L. 1985. Ancient philosopher MoDi, His school and teaching. M.) (in Russian) 
 1. Kuzyk B.N., Titarenko M.L. Rossiya-2050, strategiya innovatsionnogo proryva. M., Institut ehkonomicheskikh strategij. 2006. (Kuzyk B.N., Titarenko M.L. 2006. Russia-2050, Srategy of an innovation breakthrough. M.) (in Russian) 
 2. Yang Chaoming. Kongzi (Konfutsij) // Kongzi jiayu tongjie, 1991, r. 17
 3. Plekhanov G.V. K voprosu o roli lichnosti v istorii. M., Gospolitizdat, 1956. (Plehanov G.V. 1956. The issue of a person's influence on history. M.) (in Russian)
 4. Wang Xue. MoZi zhexuejia sixiang (Filosofskaya mysl' Motszy) // MoZi. 2001, r. 100-101.
 5. Wang Hao. Zhongguo Zhexuejia (Filosofiya Kitaya) // Zhongguo gaikuang. 2004, p. 75-77. 
 6. Malyavin V.V. Dinastiya Min. M., 2001, s. 11. (Malyavin V.V. 2001. Ming Dinasty. M.) (in Russian) 
 7. Fan Jinmin. Shehui cengci (Sloi obschestva) // Zhongguo gudaishi. 2007, p 15-17. 
 8. Malyavin V.V. Konfutsij. M., 1997, s. 111 (Malyavin V.V. 1997. Confucius. M.) (in Russian) 
 9. Perelomov L.S. Lun'yuj. M., 2001. Gl. 12 (11). (Perelomov L.S. 2001. Lunyu. M.) (in Russian) 
 10. Go Mozho. Ehpokha rabovladel'cheskogo stroya. M., 1956. 
 11. Titarenko M.L. Drevnekitajskij filosof MoDi, ego shkola i uchenie. M., Nauka, 1985. (Titarenko M.L. 1985. Ancient philosopher MoDi, His school and teaching. M.) (in Russian)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate