On the formation of a new social stratum, termed precariat, as a totally new phenomenon

Toschenko, Zhan T.

doi:10.31857/S020736760002497-5

English

Home>Issue 11>On the formation of a new social stratum, termed «precariat», as a totally new phenomenon

On the formation of a new social stratum, termed «precariat», as a totally new phenomenon

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

On the formation of a new social stratum, termed «precariat», as a totally new phenomenon

Annotation

PII

S020736760002497-5-1

DOI

10.31857/S020736760002497-5

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Zhan T. Toschenko Send message

Affiliation: Institute of Sociology, RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Edition

Issue 11

Pages

25-45

Abstract

The article discusses a new social phenomenon - precariat, its main characteristics and structures, and compares it with other social groups. The author examines the capability of precariat to develop a specific ideology of its own and the possible emergence of the new forms of class struggle.

Keywords

society, social structure, precariat, class-in-itself, class-for-itself, labor market, employment

Received

09.12.2018

Date of publication

14.12.2018

Number of purchasers

Views

1376

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf

GOST	Toschenko Z. On the formation of a new social stratum, termed «precariat», as a totally new phenomenon // Obshchestvo i ekonomika. – 2018. – Issue 11 C. 25-45 . URL: https://oieras.ru/s0373658x0005702-1-1/?version_id=7457. DOI: 10.31857/S020736760002497-5
MLA	Toschenko, Zhan T "On the formation of a new social stratum, termed «precariat», as a totally new phenomenon." Obshchestvo i ekonomika. 11 (2018).:25-45. DOI: 10.31857/S020736760002497-5
APA	Toschenko Z. (2018). On the formation of a new social stratum, termed «precariat», as a totally new phenomenon. Obshchestvo i ekonomika. no. 11, pp.25-45 DOI: 10.31857/S020736760002497-5

References

1. Anisimov R.I. Trud v ehpokhu neopredelennosti //Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 11.

2. Bizyukov P. Chto takoe prekariat? // Gazeta.ru. 2014. 1 maya.

3. Veretennikova K., Polyakov M. Zolotye sem'i // Versiya. 2017. № 21.

4. Volovskaya N.M., Plyusnina L.K., Rusina A.V. Inozemtseva A.V. Nezanyatoe naselenie i samozanyatost' v sibirskom regione // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. №5.

5. Gimpel'son V.E. Nuzhen li rossijskoj ehkonomike chelovecheskij kapital? Desyat' somnenij // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2016. № 10. S. 129-143.

6. Golenkova Z.T. Prekariat kak novoe yavlenie v sovremennoj strukture. Naemnyj rabotnik v sovremennoj Rossii // M.: Novyj khronograf. 2015.

7. Golodets O. 38 millionov trudosposobnykh rossiyan zanyaty neponyatno chem // Rossijskaya gazeta. 2013. 3 aprelya.

8. Grinberg R.S. Velikaya transformatsiya: nevyuchennye uroki // M., 2009.

9. Zhiznennyj mir rossiyan: 25 let spustya (konets 1980-kh — seredina 2010-kh gg.). / M., 2016.

10. Kozina I.M. Rabotniki zaemnogo truda //Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. №5.

11. Malakhov A. Allokhtony i avtokhtony: migranty kak sub'ekt sotsial'nogo vzaimodejstviya // Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 1.

12. Maleva T., Avraamova E. Osnovaniya mnogofunktsional'noj sotsial'noj politiki // Ehkonomicheskaya politika. 2016. T.11. № 2. S. 177–193.

13. Manujlova A. Nestandartnaya zanyatost' beret svoe /Kommersant', 2017, 17 oktyabrya.

14. Mekhanik A. Unizhennye i oskorblennye sovremennogo mira // Ehkspert. 2014. № 1.

15. Rossijskij rynok truda: tendentsii, instituty, strukturnye izmeneniya / M.: VShEh. 2017.

16. Sankova L.V. Prekariatizatsiya zanyatosti v sovremennoj ehkonomike: sistemnyj risk ili «osobaya» forma fleksibilizatsii // Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii. 2014. № 4(194). S. 44–53.

17. Smirnov S.N. Propisnye istiny trudovoj sfery // Mir Rossii. 2015. T. 24. №1.

18. Strebkov D.O., Shevchuk A.V. Trudovye tsennosti samostoyatel'noj i organizovannoj zanyatosti // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 1.

19. Stehnding G. Prekariat: novyj opasnyj klass. M.: 2014.

20. Toschenko Zh.T. Prekariat: ot protoklassa k novomu klassu // M.: Nauka. 2018.

21. Toschenko Zh.T. Prekariat – novyj sotsial'nyj klass // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 6.

22. Fishman L.G. Zakat «obschestva truda»; sovremennaya ideologicheskaya konstellyatsiya // Politiya. 2016. №3 (82).

23. Kharchenko V.S. Obraz zhizni rossijskikh frilanserov: sotsiologicheskij analiz // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 4. S. 54-63.

24. Chto zhelaet molodezhnyj prekariat Rossii? // Facebook. 29/01/2011. URL: www.chaskor.ru/article /chego_zhelaet_molodezhny.

25. Shkaratan O.I. Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskoe neravenstvo i ego vosproizvodstvo v sovremennoj Rossii // M. 2009.

26. Shkaratan O.I., Karacharovskij V.V., Gasyukova E.N. Prekariat: teoriya i ehmpiricheskij analiz (na materialakh oprosov v Rossii, 1994-2013) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. №12. S. 99–110.

27. Bourdieu P., Le precarite est aujourd’hui partour (Precariousness is Everywhere Novadays) // Contre-feux. Paris. 1998. R. 96-102.

28. Castel R. Les métamorphoses de la question sociale: une chronique du salariat // Paris: Fayard, 1995.

29. Cranford C.J., Vosko L.F., Zukewich N. Precarious employment in the Canadian labour market: a statistical portrait // Just labour. 2003. Vol. 3. P. 6–22.

30. Doogan K. New Capitalism: The Transformation of Work // Cambridge: Polity Press. 2008.

31. Ferguson J. Formalities of poverty: thinking about social assistance in South Africa’ // African Studies Review. 50(1). 2007. R. 71–86.

32. Hardt M., Negri A. Empire // Cambridge. MA. 2000.

33. Kalleberg A.L. Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition // American sociological review. 2009. Vol. 74. P. 1–22.

34. Munck R., Globalisation and Labour: The New ‘Great Tansformation’ // London: Zed Books. 2002.

35. Neilson B & N Rossiter N. Precarity as a political concept, or, Fordism as exception // Theory, Culture and Society. 25(710). 2008.

36. Pink D. Free Agent Nation: How America’s New Indededent Workers Are Transforming the Way We Live // New York: Warner Books. 2001.

37. Sassen S. The informal economy: between new developments and old regulations // Yale Law Journal. Summer. 1994. R. 2289–2304.

38. Seymor R. We are All Precarious – On the Concept of the “Precariat” and its Misuses. 2012.

39. Standing G. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. L. and N.Y.: Bloomsbury Academic. 2011.

40. Tangian A. Is flexible work precarious? A study based on the 4th European survey of working conditions 2005. WSI – Diskussionspapier. 2007. No 153. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21599.

41. Vives A., Gonzáleza F., Moncadae S., Llorense C., Benach J. Measuring precarious employment in times of crisis: the revised Employment Precariousness Scale (EPRES) in Spain // Gaceta Sanitaria. 2015. No 29(5). P. 379–382.

42. Vosko Leah F. Managing the Margins. Gender, Citizenship and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment // New York. 2010.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review

Translate

References

Comments

Via social network