Везде
SOCIAL CAPITAL AS A FACTOR OF ATTITUDE TOWARDS MONEY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
SOCIAL CAPITAL AS A FACTOR OF ATTITUDE TOWARDS MONEY
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000616-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Alexander Tatarko 
Abstract
Social capital is shown to be connected not only with macroeconomic indicators at societal level but with peoples economic behavior (n = 634). Relationships of social capital and attitude to money are considered. Assumption that social capital can fulfi ll the regulative function in peoples attitude to material resources which can manifest itself at individual level in peculiarities of attitude to money is expressed. As far as different forms of capital can convert into each other, persons high social capital must be joined with his lesser money - orientation. Social capital at the individual level has a negative infl uence on intensity of the following monetary attitudes (according to A. Furnham): Retention, Power, Inadequacy, Security.
Keywords
Social capital, monetary attitudes, social solidarity, civil identity, psychological relations, social sets, trust
Date of publication
03.05.2012
Number of purchasers
1
Views
515
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Allik J., Reallo A. Individualism-Collectivism and Social Capital // Journ. of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2004. V. 35. № 1. P. 29-49.
    2. 

  2. Barbieri P., Paugam S., Russel H. Social capital and unemployment exits // Regimes and the experience of unemployment in Europe / Eds. D. Gallie, S. Paugam. Oxford University Press, 2000. P. 200-217.
    3. 

  3. Coates D., Heckelman J. Interest groups and investment: a further test of the Olson hypothesis // Public Choice. 2003. V. 117 (3-4). P. 333-340.
    4. 

  4. Coleman J. S. Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1990.
    5. 

  5. Fukuyama F. Trust: The social Virtues and the Creation Prosperity. N. Y.: Free Press, 1999.
    6. 

  6. Fukuyama F. Social capital // Culture matters: How values shape human progress / Eds. L. Harrison, S. Huntington. N.Y.: Basic Books. 2000. P. 98-111.
    7. 

  7. Furnham A. Many sides of the coin: the psychology of money usage // Personality and Individual Differences. 1984. Vol. 5. P. 95-103.
    8. 

  8. Furnham A., Lewis A. The Economic Mind: The social psychology of economic behavior. L: Wheatsheaf, 1986.
    9. 

  9. Handbook of social capital. The Troika of Sociology, Political Science and Economics / Eds. Gert Tinggaard Svendsen, GunnarLinad Haase Svenddsen. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2010.
    10. 

  10. Hauberer J. Social Capital Theory: Towards a Methodological Foundation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften. 2011.
    11. 

  11. Healy T., Cote S., John H., Field S. The Well-Being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital. P.: OECD, 2001.
    12. 

  12. Helliwell J., Putnem R. Economic growth and social capital in Italy // Eastern Economic Journ. 1995. V. 21. № 3. P. 295-307.
    13. 

  13. Kilkenny M., Nalbarte L., Besser T. Reciprocated community support and small town-small business success // Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 1999. V. 11. № 3. P. 231-246.
    14. 

  14. Knack S., Keefer P. Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation // Quarterly Journ. of Economics. 1997 V. 112. № 4. P. 1251-1288.
    15. 

  15. Knack S. Groups, growth and trust: cross-country evidence on the Olson and Putnam hypothesis // Public Choice. 2003. V. 117 (3-4). P. 341-355.
    16. 

  16. Miller N. Contributions of social capital theory in predicting rural community inshopping behavior // Journ. of Socio-Economics. 2001. V. 30. № 6. P. 475-493.
    17. 

  17. Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage // Academy of Management Review. 1998. V. 23. № 2. P. 242-266.
    18. 

  18. Perkins D., Hughey J., Speer P. Community psychology perspectives on social capital theory and community development practice // Journ. of the Community Development Society. 2002. V. 33. № 1. P. 33-52.
    19. 

  19. Putnam R. Social capital measurement and consequences // Canadian Journ. of Policy Research. 2001. V. 2. № 1. P. 41-51.
    20. 

  20. Putnam R., Leonardi R., Nanett R. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.
    21. 

  21. Shockley-Zalabak P., Kathleen E., Gaynelle W. Organizational trust: What it means, why it matters // Organization Development Journ., 2000. V. 18. № 4. P. 35-48.
    22. 

  22. Ssewamala F., Karimli L., Chang-Keun H., Ismayilova L. Social Capital, Savings and Educational Outcomes of Orphaned Adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa // Children and Youth Services Review. 2010. V. 32. № 12. P. 1704-1710.
    23. 

  23. Tajfel H. Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge and Paris. 1982.
    24. 

  24. Taylor D. The Quest for Identity. From minority groups to Generation Xers. Praeger. 2002.
    25. 

  25. Torsvik G. Social Capital and Economic Development: A plea for the mechanisms // Rationality and Society, 2002. V. 12. № 4. P. 451-476.
    26. 

  26. Woolcock M. Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework // Theory and Society. V. 27. № 2. P. 151-208.
    27. 

  27. Woolcock M., Narayan D. Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy // The World Bank Research Observer. 2000. № 15. P. 225-249.
    28. 

  28. Zak P., Knack S. Trust and growth / Economic Journ. V. 111. № 470. P. 295-321.
    29.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate