INTERRELATION BETWEEN CREATIVITY, INTELLIGENCE AND HEMISPHERIC SPECIFY IN INFORMATION SELECTION
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
INTERRELATION BETWEEN CREATIVITY, INTELLIGENCE AND HEMISPHERIC SPECIFY IN INFORMATION SELECTION
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000616-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract

Specifi c character of hemispheric selection of hierarchic visual stimuli characterizing level of originality in fi gurative and verbal creativity testing (n = 122) with regard for verbal and fi gurative components of intelligence have been studied. Originality is shown to be due to high speed of right hemispheric processes of information selection at the global level and is positively connected with intelligence indices regardless of type of creative thinking. Successfulness of each type of creative thinking, verbal or fi gurative, requires high level of corresponding component of intelligence and effective specialization of hemispheres with rapid selection of information at the local level for left one and at the global level for right one and is accompanied by slowdown of information exchange between hemispheres.

Keywords
creativity, intelligence, hemispheric strategies, selective processes.
Date of publication
03.09.2012
Number of purchasers
1
Views
494
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


  1. Aleksandrov Yu.I., Shevchenko D.G. Nauchnaya shkola "Sistemnaya psikhofiziologiya"//Psikhol. zhurn. 2004. № 6. S. 93-100.
  2. Borovikov V.P., Borovikov I.P. STATISTICAR -Statisticheskij analiz i obrabotka dannykh v srede Windows. M.: Filin', 1997.
  3. Velichkovskij B.M. Kognitivnaya nauka: Osnovy psikhologii poznaniya. T. 2. M.: Smysl; Akademiya, 2006.
  4. Voronin A.N., Gabrielyan N.A. Intellekt i kreativnost' v situatsiyakh mezhlichnostnogo vzaimodejstviya//Intellekt i tvorchestvo/Sb. nauch. st. pod. red. A.N. Voronina. M., 2000.
  5. Grigorenko E.L. Ehksperimental'nye issledovaniya protsessa vydvizheniya i proverki gipotez v strukture poznavatel'noj aktivnosti: Avtoref. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 1989.
  6. Gurevich K.M., Akimova M.K., Kozlova V.T., Loginova G.P. Rukovodstvo po primeneniyu testa struktury intellekta Rudol'fa Amtkhauehra. Obninsk: Print, 1993.
  7. Druzhinin V.N. Psikhologiya obschikh sposobnostej. SPb.: Piter, 2002.
  8. Kornilova T.V. Tolerantnost' k neopredelennosti i intellekt kak predposylki kreativnosti//Voprosy psikhologii. 2010. № 5. S. 3-13.
  9. Razumnikova O.M., Shemelina O.S. Vzaimodejstvie lichnostnykh i kognitivnykh svojstv pri ehksperimental'nom opredelenii kreativnosti//Voprosy psikhologii. 1999. № 5. S. 130-139.
  10. Razumnikova O.M. Sposoby opredeleniya kreativnosti. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo NGTU, 2002.
  11. Razumnikova O.M. Myshlenie i funktsional'naya asimmetriya mozga. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo SO RAMN, 2004.
  12. Razumnikova O.M. Osobennosti selektsii informatsii pri kreativnom myshlenii//Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2009. T. 6. № 3. S. 134-161.
  13. Ushakov D.V. Intellekt: strukturno-dinamicheskaya teoriya. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2003.
  14. Kholodnaya M.A. Psikhologiya intellekta: paradoksy issledovaniya. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta; M.: Bars, 1997.
  15. Annett M.A. Slassifi cation of hand preference by association analysis//Brit. J. Psychol. 1970. V. 61. P. 303-321.
  16. Banich M.T. Integration of information between the cerebral hemispheres//Current Directions in Psychological Science. 1998. V. 7. P. 32-37.
  17. Bechtereva N.P., Korotkov A.D., Pakhomov S.V., Roudas M.S., Starchenko M.G., Medvedev S.V. PET study of brain maintenance of verbal creative activity//Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2004. V. 53. P. 11-20.
  18. Compton R.J., Weissman D.H. Hemispheric asymmetries in global-local perception: Effects of individual differences in neuroticism//Laterality: Asymmetries of body, brain and cognition. 2002. V. 7. № 4. P. 333-350.
  19. Danko S.G., Starchenko M.G., Bechtereva N.P. EEG Local and spatial synchronization during a test on the insight strategy of solving creative verbal tasks//Human Physiology. 2003. V. 29. № 4. P. 502-504.
  20. Fink A., Neubauer A.C. EEG oscillations during performance of verbal creativity tasks: Differential effects of sex and verbal intelligence//Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2006. № 1. P. 46-53.       
  21. Fink G.R., Marchall J.C., Hallogan P.W., Dolan R.J. Hemispheric specialization for global and local processing: the effect of stimulus category//Proc. R. Soc. L. B. 1997. V. 264. P. 487-494.
  22. Finke R.A., Ward T.B., Smith S.M. Creative cognition: theory, research, and application. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
  23. Guilford J.P., Christensen P.R. The one way relation between creative potential and IQ//J. Creative Behav. 1973. V. 7. P. 247-252.
  24. Hendrickson D.E., Hendrickson A.E. The biological base for individual differences in intelligence//Pers. Individ. Differ. 1980. № 1. P. 3-33.
  25. Howard-Jones P.A., Blakemore S.J., Samuel E.A., Summers I.R., Glaxton G. Semantic divergence and creative story generation: an fMRI investigation//Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005. V. 25. № 1. P. 240-250.
  26. Jausovec N., Jausovec K. EEG activity during the performance of complex mental problems//Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2000. V. 36. P. 73-88.
  27. Jung R.E., Haier R.J. The parieto-frontal integration theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: converging neuroimaging evidence//Behav. Brain Sci. 2007. V. 30. № 2. P. 135-154.
  28. Jung-Beeman M., Bowden E.M., Haberman J., Frymiare J.L., Arambel-Liu S., Greenblatt R., Reber P.J., Kounios J. Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight//PLoS. Biol. 2004. V. 2. P. 500-510.
  29. Kosslyn S.M. Two types of image generation: Evidence from PET//Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2005. V. 5 № 1. P. 41-53.
  30. Mihov K.M., Denzler M., Forster J. Hemispheric specialization and creative thinking: A meta-analytic review of lateralization of creativity//Brain and Cognition. 2010. V. 72. P. 442-448.
  31. Navon D. Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception//Cognition Psychology. 1977. V. 9. P. 353-383.
  32. Neubauer A.C., Grabner R.H., Fink A., Neuper C. Intelligence and neural effi ciency: further evidence of the infl uence of task content and sex on the brain-IQ relationship//Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005. V. 25. P. 217-225.
  33. O'Boyle M., Singh H. Interhemispheric interaction during global-local processing in mathematically gifted adolescents, average-ability youth, and college students//Neuropsychology. 2004. V. 18. № 2. P. 371-377.
  34. Preckel F., Holling H., Wiese M. Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory//Pers. Individ. Differ. 2006. V. 40. P. 159-170.
  35. Razumnikova O.M. Creativity related cortex creativity in the remote associates task//Brain Res. Bull. 2007. V. 73. № 1-3. P. 96-102.
  36. Robinson D.L., Behbehani J. Intelligence differences: neural transmission errors or cerebral arousability//Kybernetes. 1997. V. 26. P. 407-424.
  37. Vartanian O., Martindale C., Kwiatkowski J. Creative potential, attention, and speed of information processing//Pers. Individ. Differ. 2007. V. 43. P. 1470-1480.
  38. Volberg G., Hubner R. Hemispheric differences for the integration of stimulus levels and their contents: Evidence from bilateral presentations//Perception & Psychophysics. 2006. V. 68. P. 1274-1258.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate