Везде
ON RELIABILITY OF THE RESPONDENTS ANSWERS IN THE TELEPHONE INTERVIEWS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
ON RELIABILITY OF THE RESPONDENTS ANSWERS IN THE TELEPHONE INTERVIEWS
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000616-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Svetlana Zhuravliova  Alexander Myagkov
Edition
Issue 10
Pages
80-92
Abstract
Социологические исследования, ON RELIABILITY OF THE RESPONDENTS ANSWERS IN THE TELEPHONE INTERVIEWS
Date of publication
01.10.2010
Number of purchasers
2
Views
456
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Devyatko I.F. Metody sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya. M.: KDU, 2003. 
 2. Myagkov A.Yu. Iskrennost' respondentov v sensitivnykh oprosakh: Metody diagnostiki i stimulirovaniya. Ivanovo: GOU VPO "Ivanovskij gosudarstvennyj ehnergeticheskij universitet imeni V.I. Lenina", 2007. 
 3. Sadmen S., Brehdbern N. Kak pravil'no zadavat' voprosy: Vvedenie v proektirovanie oprosnogo instrumenta. M.: Institut Fonda "Obschestvennoe mnenie", 2002. 
 4. Batygin G.S. Lektsii po metodologii sotsiologicheskikh issledovanij. M.: Aspekt Press, 1995. 
 5. Shlapentokh Y. The Politics of Sociology in the Soviet Union. London: Westview Press, 1987. 
 6. Yadov V.A. Strategiya sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya. Opisanie, ob'yasnenie, ponimanie sotsial'noj real'nosti. M.: Dobrosaet, 2001. 
 7. Bradburn N.M., Sudmann S. Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979. 
 8. Begin G., Boivin M. Somparison of data gathered on sensitive questions via direct questionnaire, randomized response technique, and a projective method // Psychological Reports. 1980. Vol. 74. № 7. P. 751-760. 
 9. Myagkov A.Yu. Voprosnye metodiki stimulirovaniya iskrennikh otvetov v sotsiologicheskom oprose // Sotsiologiya: 4 M. 2002. № 15. S. 53-70. 
 10. Butenko I.A. Ravnotsenny li al'ternativy? // Sotsiol. issled. 1988. № 2. S. 94-97. 
 11. Moin V.B. Asimmetriya pripisyvaniya v sotsiologicheskikh oprosakh // Sotsiol. issled. 1991. № 5. S. 40-52. 
 12. Catania J., Binson D., Canchola J. et al. Effects of interviewer gender, interviewer choice, and item context on responses to questions concerning sexual behavior // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1996. Vol. 60. № 3. P. 345-375. 
 13. Grigor'eva M.V. Izmerenie gomoseksual'nosti v oprosnykh issledovaniyakh: Teoriya, metodologiya, metody: Dis.... kand. sotsiol. nauk: 22.00.01 / Ivan. gos. ehnerg. un-t. Ivanovo, 2006. 
 14. Makkai T., Mcallister I. Measuring social indicators in opinion surveys: a method to improve accuracy on sensitive questions // Social Indicators Research. 1992. Vol. 27. № 2. R. 169-186. 
 15. Gaziano S. Comparative analysis of within-household respondent selection technique // Public Opinion Quarterly. 2005. Vol. 69. № 1. R. 124-157. 
 16. Beebe T.J., Davern M.E., McAlpine D.D., Ziegenfuss J.K. Comparison of two within-household selection methods in a telephone survey of substance abuse and dependence // Annals of Epidemiology. 2007. Vol. 17. № 6. R. 458-463. 
 17. Sidorenko E.V. Metody matematicheskoj obrabotki v psikhologii. SPb.: Rech', 2001. 
 18. Myagkov A.Yu. Ehffekt prestizhnykh imen v sotsiologicheskikh oprosakh // Polis. 2000. № 6. S. 8292. 
 19. Myagkov A.Yu. Vliyanie izvestnykh politicheskikh imen v formulirovke voprosa na rezul'taty sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya // Sotsiol. issled. 2001. № 3. S. 94-104. 
 20. Ong A.D., Weiss D.J. The impact of anonymity on responses to sensitive questions // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2000. Vol. 30. № 8. R. 1691-1708. 
 21. Manuil'skaya K.M. [Rets.] Petersen T. Polevoj ehksperiment v prikladnykh issledovaniyakh: Retersen T. Das Feldexperiment in der Umfrageforschung. Frankfurt: Campus, 2002 // Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal. 2004. № 3/4. S. 203-209.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate