Везде
MOTIVATIONS FOR USING VIRTUAL SOCIAL NETWORKS BY TEENAGERS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
MOTIVATIONS FOR USING VIRTUAL SOCIAL NETWORKS BY TEENAGERS
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000378-1-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Olga Gurkina  Daria V. Maltseva
ORCID: 0000-0003-1789-1711
Edition
Volume 373 Issue 5
Pages
123-130
Abstract
An analysis of the reasons for the popularity of virtual networks among teenagers is presented. Along with highlighting the main theoretical approaches to the problem, the results of a survey of Moscow high school students are presented. The special significance of recreational opportunities of social networks for teenagers is shown.
Keywords
social networks, teenagers, social compensation, social presence
Date of publication
01.05.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
497
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Doklad “Runet segodnya”: issledovanie rossijskogo Interneta // Fond razvitiya grazhdanskogoobschestva. 25.09.2012. URL: http://civilfund.ru/mat/view/1 (data obrascheniya: 15.08.2013).


Duzhnikova A.S. Sotsial'nye seti: sovremennye tendentsii i tipy pol'zovaniya // Monitoringobschestvennogo mneniya. 2010. № 5 (sentyabr'–oktyabr'). S. 238–245.


Zavilishina M., Milovanova E. Sotsial'nye seti i podrostok. Psikhologicheskij navigator. URL:http://deti.psynavigator.ru/articles.php?code=135 (data obrascheniya: 13.08.2013).


Zotova E., Soldatova G. Rossijskie i evropejskie shkol'niki: problemy onlajn-sotsializatsii //Deti v informatsionnom obschestve. 2011. Vol. 7. S. 46–55.


Issledovanie auditorii rossijskikh sotsial'nykh setej // CMSmagazine. Analiticheskij portalrynka web-razrabotok. URL: http://research.cmsmagazine.ru/audience-research-russian-socialnetworks (data obrascheniya: 25.10.2013).


Mify i real'nost' sotsial'nykh setej v Internete // Ehntsiklopediya sajtostroeniya. URL: http://site.nic.ru/content/view/358/33/ (data obrascheniya: 12.08.2013).


Nedovishina I.V., Shakhmartova O.M. Issledovanie motivov ispol'zovaniya sotsial'nykh setej mladshimi shkol'nikami // Izvestiya PGPU im. V.G. Belinskogo. 2012. № 28. URL:http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovanie-motivov-ispolzovaniya-sotsialnyh-setey-mladshimishkolnikami (data obrascheniya: 25.08.2013).


Rossiyane v seti. Rejting populyarnosti sotsial'nykh media. VTsIOM. 13.02.2012. URL: http://wciom.ru/index.php?id=459&uid=112476 (data obrascheniya: 13.08.2013).


Fedunina N.Yu. Faktor svobody u pol'zovatelej sotsial'nykh setej podrostkovogo i yunosheskogo vozrasta // Nauchnye materialy V s'ezda Rossijskogo psikhologicheskogo obschestva. T. III.2012. C. 440–441.


Anderson-Butcher D., Ball A., Brzozowski M., Lasseigne A., Lehnert M., McCormick B.L. AdolescentWeblog Use: Risky or Protective? // Child Adolescent Social Work Journal. 2010. P. 63–77.


Amichai-Hamburger Y., Vinitzky G. Social network use and personality // Computers in Human Behavior.2010. Vol. 26. P. 1289–1295.


Arseneault J.M., Orr E.S., Simmering M.G., Ross C., Sisic M. Personality and motivations associatedwith Facebook use // Computers in Human Behavior. 2009. Vol. 25. P. 578–586.


Barker V. Older Adolescents’ Motivations for Social Network Site Use: The Influence of Gender, GroupIdentity, and Collective Self-Esteem // CyberPsychology& Behavior. 2009. Vol. 12 (2). P. 210.


Boyd D.M., Ellison N.B. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship // Journal of ComputerMediated Communication. 2008. Vol. 13. P. 210–230.


De Groot J.M., Ledbetter A.M., Mao Y., Mazer J.P., Meyer K.R., Swafford B. Attitudes Toward OnlineSocial Connection and Self-Disclosure as Predictors of Facebook // Communication Research.2011. Vol. 38(1). P. 27–53.


Evans M.A., Hare A.L., Mikami A.Y. Adolescent Peer Relationships and Behavior Problems PredictYoung Adults’ Communication on Social Networking Websites // Developmental Psychology. 2010.Vol. 46 (1). P. 46–56.


Greenfield P., Subrahmanyam K. Online Communication and Adolescent Relationships // Future ofchildren, 2008. URL: www.futureofchildren.org.


Cheung Ch. M.K., Chiu P., Lee M. Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? // Computersin Human Behavior. 2011. Vol. 27. P. 1337–1343.


Ceccucci W., Peslac A., Sendall P. An Empirical Study of Social Networking Behavior Using Theory ofReasoned Action // Conference for Information Systems Applied Research, 2011. P. 1–13.


Fogg B.J. Mass Interpersonal Persuasion: An Early View of a New Phenomenon // Third InternationalConference on Persuasive Technology. Berline: Springer, 2008.


Hargittai E., Hsieh Y.P. Predictors and consequences of social network site usage // Information,Communication and Society. 2010. Vol. 13. P. 515–536.


Hofmann S.G., Nadkarni A. Why do people use Facebook? // Personality and Individual Differences2012. Vol. 52. P. 243–249.


Joinson A.N. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook // SIGCHI.2008. P. 1027–1036.


Joinson A.N., Vasalou A., Courvoisier D. Cultural differences, experience with social networks and thenature of ‘‘true commitment’’ in Facebook // International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.2010. Vol. 68. P. 719–728.


Lin K.-Y., Lu H.-P. Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating networkexternalities and motivation theory// Computers in Human Behavior. 2011. Vol. 27. P. 1152–1161.


Lou L. Loneliness, friendship, and self-esteem: First-year college students’ experience of using facebook //Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. 2010. Vol. 70.


McElroy J.C., Moore K. The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret //Computers in Human Behavior. 2012. Vol. 28. P. 267–274.


Mehdizadeh S. Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook // Cyberpsychology,Behavior, and Social Networking. 2010. Vol. 13. P. 357–364.


Murray K.E., Waller R. Social networking goes abroad // International Educator. 2007. 16(3). P. 56–59.


Pew: 94% Of Teenagers Use Facebook, Have 425 Facebook Friends, But Twitter & Instagram AdoptionWay Up// Marketing Land. 21.05.2013. URL: http://marketingland.com/pew-the-average-teenagerhas-425-4-facebook-friends-44847.


Regan P., Steeves V. Kids R Us: Online Social Networking and the Potential for Empowerment //Surveillance & Society. 2010. Vol. 8(2). P. 157–170.


Reich S.M. Adolescents’ sense of community on myspace and facebook: a mixed-methods approach //Journal of community psychology. 2010. Vol. 38. P. 688–705.


Schaefer C. Motivations and Usage Patterns on Social Network Sites // ECIS 2008 Proceedings. Paper143. URL: http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2008/143 (data obrascheniya: 15.08.2013).


Sheldon K.M., Abad N., Hirsch C. A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction:Disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.2011. Vol. 100. P. 766–775.


Sheldon P. The Relationship Between Unwilingness-to-Communicate and Students’ Facebook Use //Journal of Media Psychology. 2008. Vol. 20(2). P. 67–75.


Tsai Ch.-M., Huang Y.-T., Hsieh J.-L. Taiwanese Facebook Users’ Motivation and the Access ofInformation Technology// Communications in Computer and Information Science. 2011. № 173.P. 469–473.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate