Везде
FEATURES OF PROFESSIONALIZATION OF CIVIL SERVANTS IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN RUSSIAN REFORMS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
FEATURES OF PROFESSIONALIZATION OF CIVIL SERVANTS IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN RUSSIAN REFORMS
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000376-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Victoria Antonova 
Edition
Volume 382 Issue 2
Pages
76-82
Abstract
The civil service is considered as a field of professional activity, and the official profession itself is considered from the standpoint of the neoveberian approach. Based on the analysis of semi-structured interviews with civil servants, the features of their professionalization are revealed. Since this sphere of activity is monopolized by the state, they experience difficulties in establishing professional autonomy, implementing the practice of social closure, and forming a positive image of the profession in society. This situation is more likely to play against the professionalization of civil servants, rather than allowing them to adapt to modern challenges. It is shown that the application of the neoveberian perspective to the analysis of the professionalization of officials opens up opportunities for regulating the profession from the perspective of interaction with citizens.
Keywords
civil servant; professionalization; ethics of the profession; neoveberian approach; professional closure; professional autonomy
Date of publication
01.02.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
444
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Abramov R.N. Sotsiologiya zanyatij i professij v Rossii: obzor tekuschej situatsii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 1. C. 99–108.


Analiticheskij doklad “Byurokratiya i vlast' v novoj Rossii: pozitsii naseleniya i otsenki ehkspertov”. M.: Institut sotsiologii RAN, 2005. URL: http://www.isras.ru/analytical_report_ bureaucracy.html (data obrascheniya: 15.08.2014).


Barabashev A.G. Ehvolyutsiya gosudarstvennoj sluzhby Rossii: itogi desyatiletiya (2000–2010). M.: NIU VShEh, 2013.


Borschevskij G.A. Reformirovanie gosudarstvennoj sluzhby v Rossii: promezhutochnye itogi // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya. 2014. № 2. S. 65–88.


Doklad ob otsenke ehffektivnosti deyatel'nosti organov ispolnitel'noj vlasti sub'ektov Rossijskoj Federatsii po itogam 2013 g. i 2014 g.


Dyurkgejm Eh. O razdelenii obschestvennogo truda. Metod sotsiologii. M.: Nauka, 1991.


Magomedov K.O. Professional'noe sostoyanie kadrov gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh sluzhaschikh, problemy professional'nogo razvitiya i kadrovye protsessy v organakh gosudarstvennoj vlasti i upravleniya RF // Otchet monitoringovogo sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya. M.: RAN- KhiGS. 2013.


Mansurov V.A., Yurchenko O.V. Sotsiologiya professij. Istoriya, metodologiya i praktika issledovanij // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 8. S. 36–46.


Mersiyanova I.V. Samoorganizatsiya i problemy formirovaniya professional'nykh soobschestv v Rossii. Nats. issled. un-t “Vysshaya shkola ehkonomiki”. M.: NIU VShEh, 2011.


Obolonskij A.V. Byurokratiya dlya XXI veka? Modeli gosudarstvennoj sluzhby: Rossiya, SShA, Angliya, Avstraliya. M.: Delo, 2002.


Reforma gosudarstvennoj sluzhby Rossii: istoriya popytok reformirovaniya s 1992 po 2000 god / Red. i predisl. T.V. Zajtsevoj. M.: Izd-vo “Ves' mir”, 2003.


Romanov P.V., Yarskaya-Smirnova E.R. Mir professij: peresmotr analiticheskikh perspektiv // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 8. S. 25–35.


Romanov P.V., Yarskaya-Smirnova E.R. Razrabotka professional'nykh standartov v sotsial'noj rabote: perspektivy i vyzovy // SPERO. 2013. № 18. S. 37–56.


Romanov P.V., Yarskaya-Smirnova E.R. Sotsial'naya rabota v sovremennoj Rossii: analiz statusa professional'noj gruppy // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 10. S. 60–69.


Turchinov A.I. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba Rossii: sostoyanie i problemy razvitiya // Sotsial'no- professional'noe razvitie gosudarstvennoj sluzhby. Mat. 13-j Obscheros. nauch.-prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem. M.: RANKhiGS, 2014. S.125–132.


Khartiya otkrytykh dannykh “Gruppy vos'mi”. URL: http://data.gov.ru/hartiya-otkrytyh-dannyh-gruppyvosmi (data obrascheniya: 12.07.2014).


Kh'yuz Eh. Professii // Antropologiya professij: granitsy zanyatosti v ehpokhu nestabil'nosti / Pod red. P. Romanova, E. Yarskoj-Smirnovoj. M., 2012. S. 31–46.


Kh'yuz Eh. Professii v obschestve // Antropologiya professij: granitsy zanyatosti v ehpokhu nestabil'nosti / Pod red. P. Romanova, E. Yarskoj-Smirnovoj. M., 2012. S. 47–58.


Chinovnikov ostavyat bez inostrannoj sobstvennosti // INTER-FAKS. 01.08.2012. URL: http:// www.interfax.ru/russia/258495 (data obrascheniya: 11.08.2014).


Yudanova D.M. Problemy reformirovaniya instituta gosudarstvennoj sluzhby Rossijskoj Federatsii // Ehkonomika, gosudarstvo, obschestvo. 2013. № 2. S. 219–221.


Andersen L., Pedersen L. Public Service Motivation and Professionalism // International Journal of Public Administration. 2012. Vol. 35. № 1. P. 46–57.


Denhardt R. The Big Questions of Public Administration Education // Public Administration Review. 2001. Vol. 61. № 5. P. 526–534.


Lynn L. Jr. What is a Neo-Weberian State? Reflections on a Concept and Its Implications. URL: http:// fsv.cuni.cz/ISS-50-version1–80227_TED1_Lynn_Whats_neoweberian_state.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.11.2013).


Olsen J. Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2005. Vol. 16. № 1. P. 1–24.


Randma-Liiv T. New Public Management versus Neo-Weberian State in Central and Eastern Europe. Tallinn, 2008. URL: http://www.cuni.cz/ISS-50-version1–080227_TED1_RandmaLiiv_NPMvsNWS. pdf (data obrascheniya: 01.03.2014).


Saks M. Professions and the Public Interest: Medical Power, Altruism and Alternative Medicine. London: Routledge,1995.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate