Везде
A Complex Structure of a Simple View, or about ‘Turns’ in Philosophy in the XX Century
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
A Complex Structure of a Simple View, or about ‘Turns’ in Philosophy in the XX Century
Annotation
PII
S004287440002601-6-1
DOI
10.31857/S004287440002601-6
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Yulia D. Artamonova 
Occupation: Associate Professor
Affiliation: History and Theory of Politics Chair, Faculty of Political Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Issue 12
Pages
206-212
Abstract

The ever-increasing number of announced twists and turns in the philosophy of the 20th century makes a practically peripheral concept that states a complete continuity of the philosophy of the 19th and 20th centuries. This discursive formation called a “regard” (view) discourse by M. Foucault encompassing so far apart from the first glance things as, for instance, clinical medicine, dandyism, literary novel of the XIX century, positivism and phenomenology needs to be represented and its key points revealed. The article shows why the key moments of the “gaze” are: 1) the rejection of the “intellectual gaze” that penetrates through things and operates at the level of the laws of nature, the observation of the “impenetrable body” of things; 2) attempts to describe “objectively” the processes on the “surface” of things for hypothetical identification of internal processes (the role of sign); 3) the unity of the problem of reality “comprehension” and the problem of those imperfect hypothetical reconstructions multiplicity. It is shown that the so-understood formation of the “gaze” does indeed include, as possible variations, the numerous subsequent turns in philosophy – linguistic, iconic, anthropological and other.

Keywords
modern, linguistic turn, anthropological turn, reality, subjectivity, objectification, project of modern, “view” formation, M. Foucault
Received
20.12.2018
Date of publication
20.12.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
845
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Apel, Karl-Otto. Towards a transcendental Semiotics (Russian Translation 2001).

2. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Philosophie und Literatur”. Was ist Literatur? Beitrage von H.-G. Gadamer, H. Kuhn, G. Funke (Russian Translation 1991).

3. Hartmann, Nicolai. Zur Grundlegung der Ontologie (Russian Translation 2003).

4. De Man, Paul. Blidness and Insight. Esseys in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism (Russian Translation 2002).

5. Foucault, Michel. Naissance de la clinique (Russian Translation 1998).

6. Habermas, Jürgen. Philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Zwoelf Vorlesungen (Russian Translation 1997).

7. Schlick, Moritz. Die Wende der Philosophie (Russian Translation 1993).

8. Rorty, Richard (ed.) (1967) The Linguistic Turn. Essays in Philosophical Method, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

9. Mamardashvili, Merab K., Solovyov, Erik Yu., Shvyrev, Vladimir S. (1970–1971) Classics and Contemporaniety: Two Epochs in the Development of Bourgeois Philosophy (http://texts.news/problemyi-filosofiiknigi/mamardashvili-solovev-shvyirev-klassika-29932.html), (in Russian).

10. Mikhailov, Aleksandr (1988) “Antiquity as an Ideal and Cultural Reality of 18th–19th Centuries”, Antiquity as a Type of Culture, A.F. Losev (ed.), Nauka, Moscow, pp. 308–324 (in Russian).

11. Savchuk, Valery (2013) “The Phenomenon of Turn in 20th Century Culture”, Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal issledovanii kultury, 2013, Vol. 1, pp. 92–108 (in Russian).

12. Wulf Kristof (2004) Anthropologie. Philosophie, Geschichte, Kultur, Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg (Russian Translation 2008).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate