Везде

RAS Social ScienceГосударство и право Gosudarstvo i pravo

  • ISSN (Print) 1026-9452
  • ISSN (Online) 2713-0398

Historical and legal analysis of the evolution of the concept of sovereignty

You can
PII
S27130398S1026945225100161-1
DOI
10.7868/S2713039825100161
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
E.V. Vinogradova
  • Occupation: Doctor of Law, Professor, Chief Researcher
  • Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
M.S. Trofimov
  • Occupation: PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Department of Administrative and Financial Law
  • Affiliation: North Caucasus Federal University
E.A. Tereshchenko
  • Occupation: PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Legal Culture and Human Rights Protection
  • Affiliation: North Caucasus Federal University
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 10
Pages
183-192
Abstract
The present study offers a comprehensive analysis of the evolution of the concept of state sovereignty in Western European political and legal thought from the 16th to the 19th century. The historical genesis of sovereignty's conceptual development, influenced by diverse social processes, can be divided into distinct periods, each marked by characteristic transformations in understanding this phenomenon – from its emergence and consolidation to its gradual erosion and fragmentation. The research spans the period from the formation of classical sovereignty doctrine in the 16th century to its critical reevaluation in the 20th century, with particular focus on key theoretical paradigms (absolutist, liberal, popular-sovereign, and pluralist), their mutual influence, and historical transformation. The methodological framework incorporates historical, comparative-legal, and institutional research methods. Today, sovereignty remains a foundational concept in both political science and jurisprudence. Its interpretation has varied significantly across cultural contexts and historical conditions. The study's findings reveal the dialectical nature of sovereignty's conceptual development, demonstrating both continuity in core principles and radical contradictions among European thinkers' theoretical models. The article contributes to and complements modern discussions about the nature of state sovereignty and its variability in the context of specific historical processes.
Keywords
суверенитет государственный суверенитет государственная власть политическая теория история правовых учений Вестфальская система
Date of publication
05.12.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
6

References

  1. 1. Андреев Н.Ю. Государственный суверенитет: попытка переосмысления//Росс. журнал правовых исследований. 2017. Т. 4. № 2. C. 19–27.
  2. 2. Andreev N.Yu. State sovereignty: an attempt to rethink//Russian Journal of Legal Research. 2017. Vol. 4.No. 2. Pp. 19–27 (in Russ.).
  3. 3. Антология мировой правовой мысли: в 5 т. Т. II. Европа: V–XVII вв. / отв. ред. Н.А.Крашенинникова. М.,1999. С. 689–695.
  4. 4. Anthology of World legal thought: in 5 vol. Vol. II. Europe: V–XVII centuries / ed. by N.A. Krasheninnikova. M., 1999.Pp. 689–695 (in Russ.).
  5. 5. Виноградова Е.В., Раттур М.В.Суверенитет как элемент западно-европейских концепций государственной независимости//Междунар. науч. вестник. 2024. № 10.С. 15–21.
  6. 6. Vinogradova E.V., Rattur M.V. Sovereignty as an element of Western European concepts of State independence//International Scientific the messenger. 2024. No. 10. Pp. 15–21 (in Russ.).
  7. 7. Гегель Г.В.Ф. Феноменология духа / пер. Г.Шпета.М.,2000.
  8. 8. Hegel G.V.F. Phenomenology of the Spirit / transl. by G. Shpet. M., 2000 (in Russ.).
  9. 9. Гегель Г.В.Ф. Философия права / пер. Б.Г.Столпнера.М., 1990.
  10. 10. Hegel G.V.F. Philosophy of Law / transl. by B.G. Stolpner. M., 1990 (in Russ.).
  11. 11. Глушаченко С.Б. Русские юристы второй половины XIX – начала ХХ вв. о правах личности и правовом государстве: историко-правовое исследование: дис. … д-ра юрид. наук. СПб., 2000.
  12. 12. Glushachenko S.B. Russian lawyers of the second half of the XIX – early XX centuries on individual rights and the Rule of Law: historical and legal research: dis. … Doctor of Law. SPb., 2000 (in Russ.).
  13. 13. Гоббс Т. Левиафан, или Материя, форма и власть государства церковного и гражданского//Гоббс Т. Избр.соч.: в2 т. М., 2001. Т. 2.
  14. 14. Hobbes T. Leviathan, or the Matter, form and power of the state of the church and civil//Hobbes T. Selected writings: in 2 vols. M., 2001. Vol. 2 (in Russ.).
  15. 15. Горбань В.С. Правовое учение Иеринга и его интерпретации: дис. … д-ра юрид. наук. М., 2019.
  16. 16. Gorban V.S. The legal doctrine of Jering and his interpretations: dis. … Doctor of Law. M., 2019 (in Russ.).
  17. 17. Гроций Г. О праве войны и мира. Три книги / пер. с лат. А.Л.Саккетти. М., 2022.
  18. 18. Grotius G. On the law of war and peace. Three books /transl. from Latin by A.L. Sacchetti. M., 2022 (in Russ.).
  19. 19. Дюги Л. Трактат о конституционном праве [Traité de droitconstitutionnel]: в 5 т. 2-е изд. Париж, 1911.
  20. 20. Dugy L. A treatise on Constitutional Law [Traité de droitconstitutionnel]: in 5 vols. 2nd ed. Paris, 1911 (in Russ.).
  21. 21. Жуков В.Н. Понятие государства: возвращение к классике//Государство и право. 2023. № 5. С. 20.
  22. 22. Zhukov V.N. The concept of the state: are turn to the classics//State and Law. 2023. No. 5. P. 20 (in Russ.).
  23. 23. Иванов А.Е. Правовая теория Джона Остина: дис. …канд. юрид. наук. М., 2023. С. 116.
  24. 24. Ivanov A.E. John Austin’s legal theory: dis. … PhD in Law. M., 2023. P. 116 (in Russ.).
  25. 25. Ласки Г.Дж. О суверенитете государства//Вестник МГОУ. Сер.: История и политические науки. 2020. № 4.C. 152–161.
  26. 26. Laski G.J. On the sovereignty of the State//Herald of Moscow State University. Ser.: History and Political Sciences. 2020. No. 4. Pp. 152–161 (in Russ.).
  27. 27. Мусихин Г.И. Классификация теорий суверенитета как попытка преодоления «концептуального эгоизма»//Общественные науки и современность. 2010. № 1. С. 65.
  28. 28. Musikhin G.I. Classification of sovereignty theories asan attempt to overcome “conceptual egoism”//Social Sciences and Modernity. 2010. No. 1. P. 65 (in Russ.).
  29. 29. Овсепян Ж.И. Основные научные концепции суверенитета: классические учения и развитие современного правопонимания//Proceedings of the National Academyof Sciences of Belarus, hymanitarian series, 2016. No. 4. Pp. 99–109.
  30. 30. Ovsepyan Zh.I. Basic scientific concepts of sovereignty: classical teachings and the development of modern legal under standing//Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Hymanitarian series. 2016. No. 4. Pp.99–109 (in Russ.).
  31. 31. Переписка Ивана Грозного с Андреем Курбским /текст подготовили Я.С. Лурье и Ю.Д. Рыков; отв. ред. Д.С.Лихачев. Л., 1979.
  32. 32. Correspondence of Ivan the Terrible with Andrei Kurbsky/text prepared by Ya.S. Lurie and Yu.D. Rykov; ed. By D.S. Likhachev. L., 1979 (in Russ.).
  33. 33. Савенков А.Н. Государство и право: Права человека и мировой порядок, основанный на верховенстве права: в 3 т. М., 2022.
  34. 34. Savenkov A.N. The State and Law: Human rights and the world order based on the rule of law: in 3 vols. M., 2022 (in Russ.).
  35. 35. Савенков А.Н. Философия права и становление российского государства-цивилизации. М., 2024. С. 577–681.
  36. 36. Savenkov A.N. Philosophy of Law and the formation of the Russian state-civilization. M., 2024. Pp. 577–681 (in Russ.).
  37. 37. Сагалова А.Л. Международная организация и плюралистическая демократия во взглядах Г.Дж. Ласки//Власть. 2013. № 8. С. 160–166.
  38. 38. Sagalova A.L. International organization and pluralistic democracy in the views of G.J. Laski//Power. 2013. No. 8.Pp. 160–166 (in Russ.).
  39. 39. Фархутдинов И.З. Доктрина о вестфальской мирной системе: мифы и реалии//Евразийский юрид. журнал.2019. № 6 (133). С. 21–31.
  40. 40. Farkhutdinov I.Z. The doctrine of the Westphalian peace system: myths and realities//Eurasian legal journal. 2019.No. 6 (133). Pp. 21–31 (in Russ.).
  41. 41. Baranger D. Parlement et souveraineté nationale sous la Ve République//Revue française de droit constitutionnel, 2005.No. 61. Pp. 5–28.
  42. 42. Beaud O. La souveraineté de l’État face à l’Unioneuropéenne//Revue trimestrielle de droit Européen. 2012.No. 3. Pp. 467–489.
  43. 43. Cohendet M.-A. Souveraineté parlementaire et étatd’urgence//Pouvoirs. 2017. No. 160. Pp. 67–80.
  44. 44. Duguit L. Souveraineté et liberté: Leçons faites à l’UniversitéColumbia (New York). Paris, 1922.
  45. 45. Foucault M. Sécurité, territoire, population. Cours au Collègede France (1977–78). Paris, 2004.
  46. 46. Foucault M. Sécurité, territoire, population. Paris, 2007.
  47. 47. Gauchet M. L’avènement de la démocratie, T. IV. Lenouveau monde. Paris, 2017.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library