- PII
- S27130398S1026945225080037-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S2713039825080037
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue number 8
- Pages
- 28-36
- Abstract
- The article examines the problems of determining the content and nature of the modern doctrine of sources of law in Anglo-American jurisprudence. Traditional approaches to judicial practice as the main characteristic of the forms and ways of expressing law in the Anglo-American legal tradition are currently being significantly supplemented in line with various theories of legal understanding, focusing primarily on procedural models for developing legally significant decisions. The study points to the dynamics of ideas about the sources of law in general and the Anglo-American legal tradition in particular. The causes and features of the changes are determined. It is emphasized that in line with Anglo-American jurisprudence, many traditional problems of legal understanding, including the question of the sources of law, are understood in the plane of logical and cognitive interpretations. The article examines the attempts of a number of well-known English and American jurists, as well as their European colleagues, to relate the problem of understanding the sources of law to the sphere of logic of legal argumentation and the corresponding semantic analysis. Suggestions are made about the possibility of a more detailed study of the construction of legal formants and their characteristics both within the framework of the proposed approaches (argumentation theory, legal hermeneutics) and in general.
- Keywords
- источник права форма права национальные типы развития права методы толкования права англо-американское право судебный прецедент правовые основания теория аргументации юридическая герменевтика иерархия правовой системы правовые форманты
- Date of publication
- 20.01.2026
- Year of publication
- 2026
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 93
References
- 1. Богдановская И.Ю. Прецедентное право. М., 1993. С. 9.
- 2. Кросс Р. Прецедент в английском праве / пер. с англ.; под общ. ред. Ф.М. Решетникова. М., 1985. С. 25.
- 3. Ketcham E. H. Sources and forms of law // International Journal of Ethics. 1930. Vol. 40. No. 3. Pp. 363–371.
- 4. Bell J. Sources of Law // The Cambridge Law Journal. 2018. Vol. 77. No. 1. Pp. 40–71.
- 5. Law in the making: a comparative survey / ed. by A. Pizzorusso. Berlin,1988. P. 18.
- 6. Raz J. The authority of law: essays on law and morality. New York, 1979. Pp. 47, 48.
- 7. Sacco R. Legal formants: a dynamic approach to Comparative Law // The American Journal of Comparative Law. 1991. Vol. 39. No. 1. P. 22.
- 8. Allan T.R.S. The sovereignty of law: freedom, constitution and common law. Oxford, 2013.
- 9. Summers R.S. Form and function in a legal system: a general study. Cambridge, 2005. Pp. 42–47.
- 10. Peczenik A. On law and reason. Dordrecht, Netherland, 1989. P. 318.
- 11. Ost F., Kerchove M. van de De la pyramide au réseau? Pour une théorie dialectique du droit. Bruxelles, 2002. Pp. 352–355.
- 12. Hart H. L.A. Concept of law. New York, 1961. P. 94.
- 13. Alexy R. A theory of legal argumentation. Oxford, 1989. Pp. 214, 218.
- 14. Vogenauer S. Sources of law and legal method in Comparative Law // The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law / M. Reimann, R. Zimmermann (eds.). 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2019. P. 885.
