Transformation of the Post-Cold War Order and the Global and Regional Powers Policy in the South Caucasus after the 2020 Karabakh War
Transformation of the Post-Cold War Order and the Global and Regional Powers Policy in the South Caucasus after the 2020 Karabakh War
Аннотация
Название публикации (др.)
Трансформация международного порядка после холодной войны и политика глобальных и региональных держав на Южном Кавказе после Карабахской войны 2020 г.
Код статьи
S268667300025814-5-
Тип публикации
Статья
Статус публикации
Опубликовано
Авторы
Погосян Бенджамин  
Аффилиация: Ереванский государственный университет
Адрес: Армения, Ереван
Выпуск
Страницы
21-37
Аннотация

The end of the Cold War ushered in a Unipolar world characterized by the US hegemony. In 1990s and early 2000s the US was realizing the strategy of “liberal hegemony” with emphasis on democracy promotion in the former socialist camp. The NATO enlargement and the support to the EU extension were key pillars of this strategy. There was a perception among pundits and policymakers that the “liberal democracy” will spread all over the world, bringing a new era of peace and stability. However, the Unipolar moment was short lived. The global financial crisis of 2007-2008 marked the beginning of the transformation of the post-Сold War order. The reasons behind this transformation are numerous – the relative decline of the US, the rise of others, most notably China, and the launch of the new multilateral organizations such as BRICS and Shanghai Cooperation Organization. The transformation of the post-cold war order brings back the notion of multipolar world and the “great power competition”. The emergence of the "multipolar world order" will inevitably trigger regional instability and the rivalry for regional hegemony. The absence of the world hegemon or the "world policeman" means that the second-tier states will be more inclined to use coercion as the primary tool to push forward their national interests. The world is facing the unraveling of the global world order with very few clues on what the new emerging order may look like. One pattern is obvious – states are putting more emphasis on the coercion, force and hybrid warfare as a key element of their foreign policy. Meanwhile, the absence of global hegemon triggers the tough and often violent struggle for dominance among regional powers. The South Caucasus was an arena of overlapping interests of many actors – Russia, the US, the EU, Turkey, and Iran. While in 1990s and 2000s the geopolitical configuration of the region was based on the competition between Turkey – Azerbaijan – Georgia partnership supported by the US, and Russia – Armenia alliance, the situation has changed in recent years. Turkey’s quest for independent foreign policy and growing tensions between Turkey and the US have resulted in a establishment of competitive/cooperative relations between Russia and Turkey. Ankara and Moscow are still competitors but they are able to manage their contradictions. The 2020 Karabakh war was a harbinger of upcoming changes in the regional balance of power. Azerbaijan won the war receiving significant military support from Turkey, Armenia suffered significant losses, while Russia deployed its peacekeepers in Nagorno Karabakh. As South Caucasus faces the growing competition between external actors vying for influence, and as Russia – West relations were completely ruined after the February 2022, the region has become another arena for Russia – West competition. The US and the EU are interested to push Russian peacekeepers out from Nagorno Karabakh after the end of the initial five-year term, viewing this as a significant step in reducing Russian influence in the region. Meanwhile, Russia seeks to stabilize relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan, meanwhile keeping its military presence in Nagorno Karabakh. Despite the growing tensions between Turkey and the US, Ankara still remains main tool for the US in its efforts to decrease Russian power in South Caucasus.

Ключевые слова
South Caucasus, world order, US, Russia, Iran, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia
Источник финансирования
This article was funded by a grant from the United States Department of State. The opinions, findings and conclusions stated herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Department of State.
Классификатор
Получено
01.10.2022
Дата публикации
30.01.2023
Всего подписок
12
Всего просмотров
522
Оценка читателей
0.0 (0 голосов)
Другие версии
S268667300025814-5-1 Дата внесения исправлений в статью - 30.05.2023
Цитировать Скачать pdf

Библиография

1. G20 Leaders' Declaration, Washington DC, 15 November, 2008. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/g20/summits/washington-dc/declarationofthesummitonfinancialmarketsandtheworldeconomy.htm

2. National Security Strategy of the United States of America, December 2017. Available at: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf

3. FACT SHEET: Implementation of the Australia – United Kingdom – United States Partnership (AUKUS). Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/04/05/fact-sheet-implementation-of-the-australia-united-kingdom-united-states-partnership-aukus.

4. Agreement signed on trade and economic cooperation between EAEU and PRC. Available at: http://www.eurasiancommission.org/en/nae/news/Pages/17-05-2018-5.aspx

5. Interview given by Dmitry Medvedev to Television Channels Channel One, Rossia, NTV. Available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/48301

6. The EU and Armenia Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement enters into force. Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eu-and-armenia-comprehensive-and-enhanced-partnership-agreement-enters-force_en

7. Statement by President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia and President of the Russian Federation. Available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/64384.

8. Richard Hoagland: ‘Lavrov plan’ on Karabakh peace not backed by conflicting sides ‘as yet’. Available at: https://artsakhpress.am/eng/news/101829/richard-hoagland-%E2%80%98lavrov-plan%E2%80%99-on-karabakh-peace-not-backed-by-conflicting-sides-%E2%80%98as-yet%E2%80%99.html.

9. Interim National Security Strategic Guidance. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/03/interim-national-security-strategic-guidance/

10. 2021 Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community. Available at: https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2021/item/2204-2021-annual-threat-assessment-of-the-u-s-intelligence-community

11. Integrated Country Strategy: Armenia. Available at: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/ICS_EUR_Armenia_Public.pdf

12. EU and Azerbaijan enhance bilateral relations, including energy cooperation. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_4550.

13. AIIB approves $600 million to support energy project of Azerbaijan. Available at: https://www.aiib.org/en/news-events/news/2016/AIIB-approves-$600-million-to-support-energy-project-of-Azerbaijan.html

14. Georgia, China sign historic Free Trade Agreement. Available at: https://agenda.ge/en/news/2017/931

15. Hualing Group. Available at: https://www.investingeorgia.org/en/key-sectors/success-stories/hualing-group.page

16. Trans-Caspian International Transport Route. Available at: https://middlecorridor.com/en/

17. Armenia, Turkey agree to open borders for third-country nationals. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/7/1/armenia-turkey-agree-to-open-border-for-third-country-nationals.

18. Prime Minister Pashinyan holds telephone conversation with the President of Turkey. Available at: https://www.primeminister.am/en/press-release/item/2022/07/11/Nikol-Pashinyan-Telephone-Conversation/

19. Armenia, Iran Open Key Gas Pipeline. Available at: https://www.azatutyun.am/a/1587258.html

20. Armenia Opens New Free Economic Zone on Iranian Border. Available at: https://emerging-europe.com/news/armenia-opens-new-free-economic-zone-on-iranian-border/

21. Iran criticizes Minsk group’s peace efforts over Nagorno-Karabakh. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/10/30/iran-criticises-minsk-groups-peace-efforts-over-nagorno-karabakh

22. What Iran’s Zarif said in his ‘whistle stop tour’ of post-war Caucasus. Available at: https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2021/01/29/iran-seeks-new-role-in-post-war-caucasus/

23. XIV BRICS summit. Available at: http://brics2022.mfa.gov.cn/eng/.

24. Blackwill R, Wright, T. 2020. The End of World Order and American Foreign Policy. Council Special Report No. 86, Council on Foreign relations.

25. Cannon, B., Rossiter, A. 2022. Locating the Quad: informality, institutional flexibility, and future alignment in the Indo-Pacific. International Politics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-022-00383-y

26. Fukuyama, F. 1989. The end of history? The National Interest, No. 16, pp. 3-18

27. Haass, R. 2019. How a World Order Ends And What Comes in Its Wake. Foreign Affairs, No. 1, pp. 22-30.

28. Haass, R., Kupchan, Ch. 2021. The New Concert of Powers. How to Prevent Catastrophe and Promote Stability in a Multipolar World. Foreign Affairs. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2021-03-23/new-concert-powers

29. Krauthammer, Ch. 1990/1991. The Unipolar Moment. Foreign Affairs, No. 1, pp. 23-32.

30. Lieberthal, K. 2011. The American Pivot to Asia. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-american-pivot-to-asia/

31. Walt, S. 2018.The Hell of Good Intentions: American Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of US Primacy, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 400 p.

Комментарии

Сообщения не найдены

Написать отзыв
Перевести