Везде
MISSILE DEFENSE PROBLEM AND MISSILE THREAT: DEBATES IN THE USA (2001-2012)
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
MISSILE DEFENSE PROBLEM AND MISSILE THREAT: DEBATES IN THE USA (2001-2012)
Annotation
PII
S268667300000616-7-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Oleg Krivolapov 
ORCID: 0000-0001-9658-2671
Edition
Issue 3 (531)
Pages
31-44
Abstract
This article delivers an analysis of the debates (in 2001-2012) over the necessity of U.S. missile defense deployment. The main parties involved were administration officials, democrats and republicans in the Congress and specialists from the U.S. think tanks. The author details each party’s complex of arguments and suggests causes of the evolution.
Keywords
missile threat, missile defense, debates
Date of publication
11.03.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
890
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S268667300000616-7-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 06.11.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Desyat' let bez Dogovora po PRO: problema protivoraketnoj oborony v rossijsko-amerikanskikh otnosheniyakh. M.: ISKRAN, 2012. 76 s. 
 2. Dogovor po PRO i pozitsiya Rossii (materialy kruglogo stola) // Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2000. № 4.
 3. Kojl F. Amerikanskaya PRO i al'ternativa Putina // Rossiya v global'noj politike. 2007. № 4 (iyul'-avgust).
 4. Prikhod'ko O. V. Amerikanskaya PRO: povtorenie istorii ili novaya perspektiva? // SShA v Kanada: ehkonomika, politika, kul'tura. 2008. № 2. 
 5. Yurij Solomonov: «Vremya dialoga s SShA po voprosu o PRO eschyo ne ushlo» // Yadernyj kontrol'. 1999. № 4
 6. Arms Control Today 2008 Presidential Q&A: President-elect Barack Obama // Arms Control Today. December 2008.
 7. Ballistic Missile Defense Programs and Policy. Hearing before the House Committee on Armed Services. 19.07.2001.
 8. Ballistic Missile Defense Review Report. Department of Defense. February 2010.
 9. Boese W. Democrats Withdraw Missile Defense Restrictions // Arms Control Today. October 2001.
 10. Boese W. U.S., Europe Anti-Missile Plans Upset Russia // Arms Control Today. March 2007.
 11. Cirincione J. Defending America // Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. Winter-Spring 2002. P. XX.
 12. Cirincione J. The Declining Ballistic Missile Threat. 18.02.2002 (http://www.carnegieendowment.org/2001/06/01/ballistic-missile-threat-to-united-states/52c3).
 13. Cirincione J. The Declining Ballistic Missile Threat. Testimony before the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs. 5.03.2008.
 14. Collins J. Overcoming the Stigma of Cooperative Missile Defense. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 16.05.2012.
 15. Converging Dangers in a Post 9/11 World. Testimony of Director of Central Intelligence George J. Tenet before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. 6.02.2002.
 16. Coyle P. Rhetoric or Reality? Missile Defense Under Bush // Arms Control Today. May 2002.
 17. Current and Future World Wide Threats to the Security of the United States. Hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee. 10.03.2009 (http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2009_hr/sasc-threat.pdf).
 18. Department of Defense Appropriations. Missile Defense Agency. Hearing of the Senate Appropriations Committee. 25.04.2007 (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-110shrg33911/pdf/CHRG-110shrg33911.pdf).
 19. Foreign Missile Developments and the Ballistic Missile Threat Through 2015. Central Intelligence Agency. December 2001.
 20. Independent Working Group on Missile Defense, the Space Relationship, & the 21st Century. 2007 Report.
 21. Independent Working Group on Missile Defense, the Space Relationship, & the 21st Century. 2009 Report. 
 22. Kimball D. G. Of Missiles and Missile Defense // Arms Control Today. October 2007. P. XX. 
 23. Klingner B. North Korean Missile Defiance Requires Stern Response. The Heritage Foundation. 12.12.2012 (http://blog.heritage.org/2012/12/12/north-korean-missile-defiance-requires-stern-response/).
 24. Klingner B. North Korean Missile Launch Demands Strong U.S. Response. The Heritage Foundation. 12.04.2012 (http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/04/north-korean-missile-launch-demands-strong-us-response).
 25. Kueter J. Missile Defense: A Continuing National Priority. George C. Marshall Institute. May 2004 (http://www.marshall.org/pdf/materials/210.pdf).
 26. Lindsay J. M., O'Hanlon M. E. Missile Defense After the ABM Treaty // Contemporary Nuclear Debates / Ed. by A. Lennon. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2002.
 27. Lt Gen Henry A. Obering III, USAF, Director, Missile Defense Agency. Missile Defense Program and Fiscal Year 2006 Budget. Spring 2005.
 28. Mendelsohn J. European Missile Defense: Strategic Imperative or Politics as Usual? // Arms Control Today. October 2007. 
 29. Missile Defense in Europe. Hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee. 24.09.2009.
 30. Mistry D. European Missile Defense: Assessing Iran's ICBM Capabilities // Arms Control Today. October 2007.
 31. News Briefing with Secretary Gates and Gen. Cartwright from the Pentagon. 17.09.2009.
 32. Nomination of Donald H. Rumsfeld to be Secretary of Defense. Hearing before the Committee on Armed Services. United States Senate. 11.01.2001.
 33. Nuclear Posture Review Report. Department of Defense. December 2001.
 34. Perry W., Schlesinger J. America’s Strategic Posture. The Final Report of the Congressional Commission of the Strategic Posture of the United States. Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2009.
 35. Prepared Testimony of U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld in the Senate Armed Services Committee. 21.06.2001.
 36. Schiller M. Characterizing the North Korean Nuclear Missile Threat. RAND Corporation. 27.09.2012.
 37. Spring B. President Obama’s Missile Defense Program Falls Behind the Threat. The Heritage Foundation. 3.05.2012.
 38. Statement by Director of Central Intelligence George J. Tenet before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on the “Worldwide Threat 2001 National Security in a Changing World”. 7.02.2001.
 39. Statement of Brian R. Green, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategic Capabilities before the Strategic Forces Subcommittee. House Armed Services Committee on FY 2008 Budget Request for Missile Defense Programs. 11.04.2007.
 40. The National Defense Authorization Request FY 2002. Hearing before the House Armed Services Committee. 28.06.2001.
 41. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. The White House. September, 2002.
 42. Thielmann G. Long-Range Ballistic Missile Development: A Tale of Two Tests. ACA Threat Assessment Brief. 10.05.2012 (http://www.armscontrol.org/files/TAB_Long-Range-Ballistic-Missile-Development-A-Tale-of-Two-Tests.pdf).
 43. Thielmann G. Rumsfeld Reprise? The Missile Report That Foretold the Iraq Intelligence Controversy // Arms Control Today. July/August 2003.
 44. Thielmann G. Strategic Missile Defense: A Reality Check. ACA Threat Assessment Brief. 21.05.2009 (http://armscontrol.org/system/files/TAB_StrategicMissileDefense.pdf).
 45. What Are the Prospects? What Are the Costs?: Oversight of Missile Defense (Part 2). Hearing before the House Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs. 16.04.2008 (http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2008_hr/bmd-pt2.pdf).
 46. What's Wrong with Missile Defense, Interview with T. Postol // The Boston Review. October-November, 2001 (http://bostonreview.net/BR26.5/postol.html).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate