- PII
- S102694520018161-8-
- DOI
- 10.31857/S102694520018161-8
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue 5
- Pages
- 20-32
- Abstract
The article verifies the presence of postmodernism and post-law as a product of socio-psychological foundation derived from it. In this regard, the validity of using the state of frustration as a psychological phenomenon to criticize modernity and explain the origin of postmodernity is considered. That is, the underlying excitement that, according to postmodernists, arose as a result of a total crisis and triggered mechanisms for revaluation of values, breaking stereotypes, changing role behavior and abandoning implicit ideas. As a result, it was revealed that disillusionment is artificially used by post-classics to justify the concepts defended. The socio-psychological destabilization occurred not due to the collapse of the ideals of modernity, but due to the immersion of mankind into an unknown virtual-digital environment, the knowledge of which will change society and at the same time return it to a position of equilibrium. However, the postmodern ignores reality, refutes modernity, blames it for the crisis and overthrows the current knowledge of law, biased constructs post-law from anti-values and brings it to life, thereby forming another center of turbulence.
- Keywords
- postmodern, post-law, post-classics, psychosomatics, simulacrum, crisis, uncertainty
- Date of publication
- 18.05.2022
- Number of purchasers
- 15
- Views
- 1096
References
- 1. Alekseev S.S. The most sacred thing that God has on earth. Immanuel Kant and the problems of law in the modern era. M., 1998. P. 254 (in Russ.).
- 2. Anderson P. The Origins of postmodernism / transl. from the English by A. Appolonov, ed. by M. Mayatsky. M., 2011. P. 106, 107 (in Russ.).
- 3. Architecture and Philosophy. Interview with Jacques Derrida. Leningrad – Paris // Conversation. Religious and philosophical journal. 1986. No. 4. P. 120, 121, 136 (in Russ.).
- 4. Bauman Z. The dispute about postmodernism // Sociological Journal. 1994. No. 4. P. 69 - 80 (in Russ.).
- 5. Bachilo I.L. State and law of the XXI century. Real and virtual. M., 2012. P. 7 (in Russ.).
- 6. Bibikhin V.V. Property. The philosophy of the. St. Petersburg, 2012. P. 138 (in Russ.).
- 7. Baudrillard J. Consumer society. His myths and structures / translated from French, afterword and note by E.A. Samarskaya, M., 2006. P. 64 (in Russ.).
- 8. Gaidenko P.P. The formation of New European natural science: overcoming the paradoxes of the actu-al infinite // Metaphysics. 2011. No. 1 (1). P. 65 - 87 (in Russ.).
- 9. Guthrie U.K.C. History of Greek Philosophy6 in 6 vols. I: Early Pre-Socratics and Pythagoreans / transl. from English ed. and with the note of L. Ya. Zhmudya. SPb., 2015. P. 727 (in Russ.).
- 10. Herder I.G. Selected writings / transl. from German. M.; L., 1959. P. 10, 11, 13, 302 (in Russ.).
- 11. Goethe I. Faust / transl. B. Pasternak, intro. art. and comm. N. Wilmont. M., 1960 (in Russ.).
- 12. Gogol N.V. The complete works: in 14 vols. L., 1952. Vol. 13. P. 435 - 446 (in Russ.).
- 13. Gorban V.S. Qualified reader or interpreter: on the researcher’s attitude to the sources of knowledge of legal and political doctrines // Law and Politics. 2021. No. 9. P. 133–142 (in Russ.).
- 14. Grechko P.K. Intellectual import, or About peripheral postmodernism // Social Sciences and modernity. 2000. No. 2. P. 166 - 177 (in Russ.).
- 15. Hugo Grotius. On the law of war and peace: reprint ed. 1956, M., 1994. P. 67, 84 (in Russ.).
- 16. Damaskin O.V. The state and the law in the conditions of the crisis of modern civilization // Citizen. Elections. Power. 2020. No. 2 (16) (in Russ.).
- 17. Descartes Rene. Selected works / transl. from French and Latin. M., 1950. P. 369. 428 (in Russ.).
- 18. Jamison F. Marxism and the interpretation of culture / transl. from English M., Ekaterinburg, 2014. P. 289 (in Russ.).
- 19. Diltey V. Collected works: in 6 vols. Vol. 1. Introduction to the sciences of the spirit / ed. by A.V. Mikhailov and N.S. Plotnikov; transl. from German ed. by B.C. Malakhov. M., 2000. P. 114, 147, 148 (in Russ.).
- 20. Dostoevsky F.M. Diary of a writer. 1876. April. Ch. 2. L., 1994 (in Russ.).
- 21. Dostoevsky F.M. Collected works: in 9 vols. Vol. 9: in 2 books. Book 2: Diary of a writer. M., 2007. P. 107 (in Russ.).
- 22. Zorkin V.D. The law of force and the power of law: a lecture for participants of the V International. legal forum. St. Petersburg, May 28, 2015 (in Russ.).
- 23. Liotar Zh.-F. The state of postmodernity / transl. from French N.A. Shmatko. M., 1998. P. 12 (in Russ.).
- 24. Mazilov V.A. The subject of psychological science and philosophy of psychology // Fundamental and applied research of modern psychology: results and prospects of development / ed. A.L. Zhuravlev, V.A. Koltsova. M., 2017. P. 108-115 (in Russ.).
- 25. Petrovskaya E.V. Postmodernism // New philosophical encyclopedia: in 4 vols, 2010. Vol. 3. P. 297 (in Russ.).
- 26. Savenkov A.N. State and law during the crisis of modern civilization. M., 2020 (in Russ.).
- 27. Toffler E. Futurshok / transl. from English. SPb., 1997. P. 320 - 323 (in Russ.).
- 28. Toffler E. The Shock of the future / transl. from English. M., 2002 (in Russ.).
- 29. Frank S.L. Reality and man. Metaphysics of human existence. Paris, 1956. P. 378 (in Russ.).
- 30. Hassan I. To the concept of postmodernism // Hassan I. Postmodernist turn. 1987 (in Russ.).
- 31. Chestnov I.L. Legal understanding in the Postmodern era // Jurisprudence. 2002. No. 2 (241). P. 4 (in Russ.).
- 32. Shene M. Permanent crisis. The growth of the financial aristocracy and the defeat of democracy / transl. from French by M. Mayatsky, A. Shargorodsky; ed. by M. Mayatsky. M., 2017. P. 26 (in Russ.).
- 33. Shchelkin A.G. Postmodernism – a completed project. Is a renaissance of classics possible? // “Russian Thought” – Historical and methodological seminar in the Russian Academy of Sciences. January 18, 2013 (in Russ.).
- 34. Bilder R. Rethinking International Human Rights: What Have We Learned, Where are We Going? (Summer 1999). URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=909208 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.909208
- 35. Garrett B. The Myth of the Presumption of Innocence / Texas Law Review. Vol. 94. No. 178. April 29. 2016. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2772661
- 36. Cottone M. Rethinking Presumed Knowledge of the Law in the Regulatory Age // Tennessee Law Review. Vol. 82. No. 137. Winter 2015. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2584034
- 37. Jameson F. Marxism and Form. Princeton, 1971. P. 105.
- 38. Jameson F. Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism // New Left Review. I. No 146. July–August 1984.
- 39. Kalhan A. Rethinking Immigration Detention / Columbia Law Review Sidebar. Vol. 110. P. 42. July 2010 // Drexel University Earle Mack School of Law Research Paper No. 1556867. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1556867
- 40. Kingsbury B. The International Legal Order. Oxford University Press, 2003. URL: https: // ssrn.com/abstract=692626 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.692626
- 41. Misch G. Vorbericht. In: V, LXII.
- 42. Schanck P. Understanding Postmodern Thought and Its Implications, 65 S. CAL. L. REV. 2505, 2508 (1992).
- 43. Scott-Hayward C. Rethinking Federal Diversion: The Rise of Specialized Criminal Courts // Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law. 22(2). 47. April 28, 2017. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2956021
- 44. Toscano A. Against Speculation, or, A Critique of the Critique of Critique: A Remark on Quentin Meillassoux’s After Finitude (After Colletti) // The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism / L. Bryant, N. Srnicek, G. Harman (end.) Melbourne, 2010. P. 87.
- 45. Weissmann А. Rethinking Criminal Corporate Liability / Indiana Law Journal. Vol. 82. No. 2. Spring 2007. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=979055
