RAS Social ScienceGosudarstvo i pravo

  • ISSN (Print) 1026-9452
  • ISSN (Online)2713-0398

Gender equality in the context of digitalization: the european legal experience

PII
S102694520016449-4-
DOI
10.31857/S102694520016449-4
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 5
Pages
115-123
Abstract

The principle of gender equality is closely linked to the right to non-discrimination, which has come into national legislations from international law. The evolution of the principle of equality from formal to substantive has been influenced by the Anglo-Saxon approach to European Union law, which focuses on equal treatment. In general, a fairly uniform model of anti-discrimination legislation has emerged worldwide.

The digitalization process has brought with it new threats, and a number of countries have already identified a gender gap in access to technology. However, the greatest risks are posed by digital gender discrimination - direct or indirect discriminatory actions that are based on automatic decisions made by algorithms. Such decision-making cannot be described as technology-neutral, as the algorithm may reflect the prejudices of programmers. The discriminatory decisions made by algorithms will be consistent and systematic, which is much more dangerous than individual human decisions. The causes of digital discrimination lie in modelling and making predictive recommendations based on discriminatory data, and in training algorithms based on discriminatory data. To overcome this complex problem - from the legal point of view - it is necessary to enforce the rule of transparency of algorithms as well as the decisions they make. It is necessary to conduct an audit of the algorithms - a special evaluation of the algorithm for potential violations of human rights. Also, the possibility and procedure of using artificial intelligence for decision-making must be regulated by laws. Some artificial intelligence systems should be banned outright, while others should be strictly controlled. The Proposal for a European regulation on artificial intelligence amply demonstrates this.

Keywords
discrimination, algorithm, digital technology, equal treatment, artificial intelligence, gender equality
Date of publication
18.05.2022
Number of purchasers
14
Views
882

References

  1. 1. Govorova N.V. Women in the digital economy of the European Union // Woman in Russ. society. 2021. No. 2. P. 167, 168 (in Russ.).
  2. 2. Gurinskaya A.L. Supervision as a means of ensuring security: from prison space to cyberspace // Criminology: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2014. Vol. 33. No. 2. P. 92, 93 (in Russ.).
  3. 3. Kalabikhina I.E. How do we know that gender equality is coming? // Woman in Russ. society. 2021. No. 2. P. 11 (in Russ.).
  4. 4. Shirokanova A.A., Volchenko O.V. “Big Brother is watching you”: the acceptability of state online surveillance in 30 European countries (according to EVS-2017) // Information Society. 2020. No. 2. P. 92, 93 (in Russ.).
  5. 5. Akhmatova D.-M., Akhmatova M.-S. Promoting digital humanitarian action in protecting human rights: hope or hype // Journal of International Humanitarian Action. 2020. No. 5. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-020-00076-2 (accessed: 02.09.2021).
  6. 6. Besson S. Gender Discrimination under EU and ECHR Law: Never Shall the Twain Meet? // Human Rights Law Review. 2008. Vol. 8. Issue 4. P. 675 - 677.
  7. 7. Caliskan A., Bryson J., Narayanan A. Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. 2017. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316973825_Semantics_derived_automatically_from_language_corpora_contain_human-like_biases (accessed: 02.09.2021).
  8. 8. Criado N., Such J.M. Digital Discrimination. 2019. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336792693_Digital_Discrimination (accessed: 02.09.2021).
  9. 9. Dhoquois R. La recherche féministe à l’université dans le domaine du droit – Une absence en forme de désertion // Les Cahiers du CEDREF. 2001. No. 10. P. 171 - 177.
  10. 10. Gerards J. Non-Discrimination, the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights: Who Takes the Lead? In: T. Giegerich (ed.). The European Union as Protector and Promoter of Equality. Cham: Springer, 2020. Р. 138.
  11. 11. Junter A., Ressot C. La discrimination sexiste: les regards du droit // Revue de l’OFCE. 2010. Vol. 114. No. 3. P. 75.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library