Везде
THE DETERMINATION OF THE LAW APPLICABLE ON THE MERITS OF THE DISPUTE BY THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE DETERMINATION OF THE LAW APPLICABLE ON THE MERITS OF THE DISPUTE BY THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000617-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Marina Bardina 
Edition
Issue 9
Pages
81-90
Abstract
The article is devoted to the peculiarities of the determination of applicable law by international commercial arbitration. It contains the analysis of the choice by the parties of the dispute of rules of law, taking into account the special interpretation of this term in legislation and in the Rules, which includes not only the law, but alsо transnational rules, created for international commercial turnover. There are considered the methods of determination of applicable law by arbitrators, which are free from the application of the conflict of law rules of the place of arbitration. It is concluded that the tendency of denationalization of arbitration answers the intention of the participants of international trade to settle disputes in the neutral body to ensure the equal opportunities to defend their interests.
Keywords
international commercial arbitration, applicable law, interpretation of the term “rules of law”, applicable confl ict of law rules, direct choice of law, transnational law
Date of publication
01.09.2010
Number of purchasers
2
Views
1178
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials

1. http: // www.uncitral.org/pdf/russian/texts/arbitration/mlarbA1R.pdf  
 2. Vedomosti S'ezda narodnykh deputatov i Verkhovnogo Soveta RF. 1993. № 32. St. 1240.  
 3. Kommentarij k st.1186 GK RF // V kn.: Kommentarij k chasti tret'ej Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federatsii / Pod red. A.L. Makovskogo i E.A. Sukhanova. M., 2002. S. 307.  
 4. Holtzmann H.M. Aplication of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts Goverened by the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration / The UNIDROIT Principles: a common law of contracts for the Americas- Acts/Inter-American Congress. Valencia (Venezuella) 6-9 Nov., 1996. Rome, 1998. R. 163- 164.  
 5. Moss D.K. Avtonomiya voli v praktike mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha. M., 1996. S. 47-50.  
 6. Foucharg, Gaillard E., Goldmana. On International Commercial Arbitration / Ed. by E. Gaillard and J. Savage. The Hague, 1999. R. 802.  
 7. Franke U. A New Arbitration Regime in Sweden // Stockholm arbitration Report. 1991. № 1. R. 19.  
 8. Greenblatt G.L., Griffin P. Towards the Harmonizaton of International Arbitration Rules: Comparative Analysis of the Rules of ICC, FFF, LCIA and CIET // Journal of International arbitration. 2001. № 17. R. 109.  
 9. Sanders R. Has the Moment come to reverse Arbitration Rules of UNCITRAL- // Arbitration International. 2004. № 10. R. 254.  
 10. Komarov A.S. Rol' MKAS v praktike mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha v Rossii // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. № 10. 2007. S. 15.     
 11. Komarov A.S. Pravovoe regulirovanie vneshneehkonomicheskikh operatsij i unifikatsiya prava mezhdunarodnoj torgovli // V kn.: Vneshnyaya torgovlya na rubezhe vekov. M., 2001. S. 381-400  
 12. Vilkova N.G. Dogovornoe pravo v mezhdunarodnom oborote. M., 2002. S. 205-273  
 13. Bakhin S.V. Subpravo (Mezhdunarodnye svody unifitsirovannogo kontraktnogo prava). SPb., 2002. S. 16-125.     
 14. Printsipy mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh dogovorov UNIDRUA / Per. s angl. A.S. Komarova. M., 2006.     
 15. tam zhe. S. 4.  
 16. Reshenie MKAS pri TPP RF po delu № 174 / 2003 ot 12 noyabrya 2004 g. // Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh. 2005. № 3. S. 121-143.  
 17. Reshenie MKAS pri TPP RF po delu № 93/2006 ot 22 avgusta 2007 g. // Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh. 2008. № 1. S. 112-117.  
 18. Ole L. The Applicable to the Merits of the Dispute // Arbitration International. 1986. Vol. 2. № 2  
 19. Blessing M. Choice of Substantive Law in International Arbitration // Journal of International Arbitration. 1997. June. № 2  
 20. Wortmann B. Choice of Law by Arbitrators. The Applicable Conflict of Law System // Arbitration International. Vol. 14. № 2. 1998.  
 21. Rozenberg M.G. Mezhdunarodnyj dogovor i inostrannoe pravo v praktike Mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazhnogo suda. M., 2001. S. 67-70  
 22. Komarov A.S. Razreshenie vneshneehkonomicheskikh sporov mezhdunarodnym arbitrazhem // V kn.: Pravovoe regulirovanie vneshneehkonomicheskoj deyatel'nosti. M., 2001. S. 567  
 23. Kabatov V.A. Vybor primenimogo prava // EhZh-Yurist. 2001. № 42  
 24. Bardina M.P. Opredelenie primenimogo prava v resheniyakh MKAS pri TPP RF // Tretejskij sud. 2005. № 4     
 25. Vilkova N.G. Rol' MKAS pri TPP RF v stanovlenii i razvitii sovremennogo kollizionnogo regulirovaniya dogovornykh otnoshenij s inostrannym ehlementom // V kn.: Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh: sovremennye problemy i resheniya. Sbornik statej k 75-letiyu Mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazhnogo suda pri TPP RF. M., 2007.  
 26. Quyen S., Truong S. The Law Applicable to the Merits in International Distribution Contracts: An Analysis of ICC Arbitral Awards // ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin. Vol. 12. Spring. 2001. № 1. R. 44.  
 27. Wortmann V. Op. cit. R. 109.  
 28. Fouchard L. Op. cit. P. 869.  
 29. ibid. P. 870.  
 30. Kabatova E.V. Pryamoj vybor primenimogo prava v mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe // Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh: sovremennye problemy i resheniya. Sbornik statej k 75-letiyu Mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazhnogo suda pri TPP RF.  
 31. Fouchard G. Op. cit. R. 867.  
 32. Blessing M. Choice of Substantive Law in International Arbitration // Journal of International Arbitration. Vol. 14. 1997. June. № 2. R. 55.  
 33. Blessing M. Introduction to arbitration -Swiss and International Perspectives. Basel, 1999. Rart II. R. 226.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate