Везде
The nature and significance of the requirements of comprehensiveness, completeness, objectivity and reliability of evidence in criminal proceedings
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The nature and significance of the requirements of comprehensiveness, completeness, objectivity and reliability of evidence in criminal proceedings
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000616-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Valerij Zazhiczkij 
Edition
Issue 10
Pages
76-87
Abstract
in this article on the basis of a systemic analysis of legal instructions of the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and scientific sources, the essence and importance of comprehensiveness, completeness, objectivity and reliability of evidence in criminal proceedings are revealed. The extensions of this provision in this criminal procedure legislation of Russia are indicated, as well as the opinions of scientists have been analyzed concerning this vitally important scientific and practical problem. Thereupon the author of the article gives reasons of specific proposals aimed at further improvement of the current Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. The implementation of these proposals in due legal form could act to raise the effectiveness of the judicial and investigative practice in criminal matters.
Keywords
comprehensiveness, completeness, objectivity and reliability, evidence in criminal proceedings, principles of criminal procedure, demand, competitiveness, circumstances which are relevant to the criminal case, objective truth
Date of publication
01.10.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
1285
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Syrykh V.M. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. M., 2002. S. 182. 
 
 2. Kontseptsiya sudebnoj reformy v Rossijskoj Federatsii. M., 1992. S. 34. 
 
 3. Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. 1959. № 1. St. 6. 
 
 4. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe zakonodatel'stvo Soyuza SSR i RSFSR. Teoreticheskaya model'. S. 22, 56. 
 
 5. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. Obschaya chast' / Pod red. A.D. Bojkova i I.I. Karpetsa. M., 1989. S. 159, 160. 
 
 6. Teoriya dokazatel'stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. M., 1973. S. 330, 331 
 
 7. Zinatullin Z.Z. Problemy soglasovannosti i differentsiatsii protsessual'no-pravovykh printsipov // Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. "Ugolovno-protsessual'nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federatsii: god pravoprimeneniya i prepodavaniya". M., 2004. S. 71. 
 
 8. Barabash A.S., Brester A.A. Metod rossijskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. SPb., 2013. S. 124. 
 
 9. Zazhitskij V.I. Sostyazatel'nost' v ugolovnom protsesse // Gos. i pravo. 2014. № 8. S. 39-50. 
 
 10. Kholodenko V.D. O sovershenstvovanii pravovoj reglamentatsii ugolovnogo presledovaniya i obvineniya // Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. "Ugolovno-protsessual'nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federatsii: god pravoprimeneniya i prepodavaniya". S. 241. 
 
 11. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe pravo / Pod red. V.M. Lebedeva. M., 2012. S. 227. 
 
 12. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossijskoj Federatsii / Pod red. I.L. Petrukhina, I.B. Mikhajlovskoj. M., 2013. S. 45. 
 
 13. Ugolovnyj protsess / Pod red. K.F. Gutsenko. M., 2005. S. 124. 
 
 14. Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa / Pod red. L.V. Golovko. M., 2016. S. 294. 
 
 15. Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2007. № 5. S. 17. 
 
 16. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 21 dekabrya 2010 g. // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2010. № 28 
 
 17. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF "O soblyudenii sudami Rossijskoj Federatsii protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva pri sudebnom razbiratel'stve ugolovnykh del" ot 17 sentyabrya 1975 g. (v red. ot 6 fevralya 2007 g.) 
 
 18. Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2007. № 9. S. 23. 
 
 19. Alekseev S.S. Obschaya teoriya prava. T. 1. M., 1981. S. 261-263. 
 
 20. Cholakyan B.A. Zakon i rodstvennye emu ponyatiya (Zakon i printsip). Filosofskie voprosy logicheskogo analiza nauchnogo znaniya. Vyp. 2. Erevan, 1971. S. 114 
 
 21. Solov'yov A.B., Tokareva M.E. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya obschikh polozhenij ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva Rossii. M., 2010. S. 48.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate