Везде
Nekotory`e voprosy` uchastiya advokata v ugolovnom processe v kontekste prava na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel`stvo
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Nekotory`e voprosy` uchastiya advokata v ugolovnom processe v kontekste prava na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel`stvo
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000525-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Fardin Khalilov 
ORCID: 0000-0001-9260-2997
Edition
Issue 2
Pages
42-48
Abstract
the Convention on protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms is one of the main documents of the Council of Europe. Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right for fair trial, and has fundamental value for functioning of democratic society. The right to a counsel is an integral part of the fair trial. In article the case-law practice of the European Court connected with ensuring the right to counsel has been analyzed and systematized in the context of separate features of participation in the case of the lawyer-defender.
Keywords
the European Court of human rights, criminal trial, lawyer, fairness of trial, minimum rights, case-law practice, analysis
Date of publication
01.02.2018
Number of purchasers
8
Views
1340
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Vitkauskas D., Dikov G. Zaschita prava na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel'stvo v ramkakh Evropejskoj konventsii o zaschite prav cheloveka. Seriya posobij Soveta Evropy. Voronezh, 2014. S. 9, 11 
 
 2. Rabtsevich O.I. Pravo na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel'stvo: mezhdunarodnoe i vnutrigosudarstvennoe pravovoe regulirovanie: dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2003. S. 11 
 
 3. Simagin A.S. Konventsiya o zaschite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod i protokoly k nej v sisteme istochnikov ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava Rossii: dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2011. S. 13 
 
 4. Ensslin, Baader and Raspe v. Germany (1978), 14 DR64 
 
 5. Dombo Beheer v. Netherlands, 27.10.1993, 18 E.H.R.R. 213, § 33 
 
 6. Neumeister v. Austria, 27.06.1968, 1 E.H.R.R. 91, § 22 
 
 7. De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24.02. 1997 (Application no. 19983/92) 
 
 8. Kharris D., O'Bojl M. i Uorbrik K. Pravo Evropejskoj konventsii po pravam cheloveka: k 20-letiyu vstupleniya Rossijskoj Federatsii v Sovet Evropy / per. s angl. V.A. Vlasi-khin i dr. 3-e izd. M., 2016. S. 557 
 
 9. Coeme and Others v. Belguim, 22.06.2000 (Application no. 32492/96), § 102 
 
 10. Peric v. Croatia, 27.06.2008 (Application no. 34499/06) 
 
 11. Inceoglu S. insan Haklari Avrupa Mahkemesi kararlarinda adil yargilanma hakki. istanbul, 2013, S. 221, 249 
 
 12. Niderost-Huber v. Switzerland, 18.02.1997 (Application no. 18990/91) 
 
 13. Nekazakov V.Ya. Konstitutsionno-pravovye voprosy realizatsii v rossijskom prave i pravoprimenitel'noj praktike statej 5 i 6 Evropejskoj konventsii o zaschite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod (pravo na svobodu, lichnuyu neprikosnovennost' i spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel'stvo): dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2005. S. 161 
 
 14. Edwards and Lewis v. United Kingdom, 27.10.2004 (Application nos. 39647/98 and 40461/98) 
 
 15. Rowe and Davis v. United Kingdom, 16.02.2000, 30 E.H.R.R. 1 
 
 16. Edwards and Lewis v. United Kingdom, 27.10.2004 (Application nos. 39647/98 and 40461/98) 
 
 17. X. v. Austria (1967) 22 CD96 
 
 18. Galstyan v. Armenia, 15.10.2007, 50 E.H.R.R. 618 
 
 19. Perez Mahia v. Spain (1985), 9 E.H.R.R. 145 
 
 20. Berlinski v. Poland, 20.06.2002 (Application nos. 27715/95 and 30209/96) 
 
 21. Goddi v. Italy, 09.04.1984, 6 E.H.R.R. 457 
 
 22. Goddi v. Italy, 09.04.1984, 6 E.H.R.R. 457 
 
 23. Ocalan v. Turkey, 12.05.2005, 41 E.H.R.R. 985 
 
 24. Moiseyev v. Russia, 09.10.2008, 53 E.H.R.R. 306 
 
 25. Campbell and Fell v. United Kingdom, 28.06.1984 
 
 26. Goddi v. Italy, 09.04.1984, 6 E.H.R.R. 457 
 
 27. Can v. Austria, 30.09.1985 (Application no. 9300/81) 
 
 28. Foucher v. France, 18.03.1997 (Application no. 22209/93) 
 
 29. Pakelli v. Germany, 25.04.1983 (Application no. 8398/78) 
 
 30. Pishchalnikov v. Russia, 24.12.2009 (Application no. 7025/04) 
 
 31. §aman v. Turkey, 05.07.2011 (Application no. 35292/05) 
 
 32. Croissant v. Germany, 25.09.1992, 16 E.H.H.R. 135 
 
 33. Croissant v. Germany, 25.09.1992, 16 E.H.H.R. 135, § 30 
 
 34. Yaremenko v. Ukraine, 12.09.2008 (Application no. 32092/02) 
 
 35. Panovits v. Cyprus, 11.12.2008 (Application no. 4268/04) 
 
 36. Ocalan v. Turkey, 12.05.2005, 41 E.H.R.R. 985 
 
 37. Aleksandr Zaichenko v. Russia, 28.06.2010 (Application no. 39660/02) 
 
 38. John Murray v. United Kingdom, 08.02.1996, 22 E.H.R.R. 29, § 63 
 
 39. Yurttas v. Turkey, 27.05.2004 (Application nos. 25143/94 and 27098/95) 
 
 40. Salduz v. Turkey, 27.11.2008 (Application no. 36391/02) 
 
 41. Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24.10.1993, 17 E.H.R.R. 441 
 
 42. Kharris D., O'Bojl M. i Uorbrik K. Ukaz. soch. S. 641 
 
 43. Dayanan v. Turkey, 13.01.2010 (Application no. 7377/03) 
 
 44. Artico v. Italy, 13.05.1980, 3 E.H.R.R. 1 
 
 45. Alvarez Sanchez v. Spain, 23.10.2001 (Application no. 50720/99) 
 
 46. Koplinger v. Austria, 29.03.1966 (Application no. 1850/63) 
 
 47. Goddi v. Italy, 09.04.1984, 6 E.H.R.R. 457 
 
 48. Biondo v. Italy, 05.05.1983 (Application no. 8821/79) 
 
 49. Kamasinski v. Austria, 19.12.1989, 19 E.H.R.R. 36 
 
 50. Gbveg v. Turkey, 20.01.2009 (Application no. 70337/01) 
 
 51. Czekalla v. Portugal, 10.10.2002 (Application no. 38830/97) 
 
 52. Stanford v. United Kingdom, 23.02.1994 (Application no. 16757/90) 
 
 53. Ocalan v. Turkey, 12.05.2005, 41 E.H.R.R. 985 
 
 54. McComb v. United Kingdom (1968), 50 DR81 
 
 55. Zagaria v. Italy, 27.11.2007 (Application no. 58295/00) 
 
 56. Campbell and Fell v. United Kingdom, 28.06.1984, 7 E.H.R.R. 165 
 
 57. Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, 25.10.2013 (Application nos. 11082/06 and 13772/05) 
 
 58. Kempers v. Austria, 27.02.1997 (Application no. 21842/93) 
 
 59. Castravet v. Moldova, 13.06.2007 (Application no. 23393/05) 
 
 60. Brusnitsyn L.V. Ogranichenie prava na svidaniya zaschitnika s podzaschitnym v natsional'nom i mezhdunarodnom prave // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2002. № 11. S. 105-109 
 
 61. Poitrimol v. France, 23.11.1993, 18 E.H.R.R. 130 
 
 62. Pietilainen v. Finland, 22.09.2009 (Application no. 13566/06 
 
 63. Pakelli v. Germany, 25.04.1983 (Application no. 8398/78) 
 
 64. Pham Hoang v. France, 29.08.1992, 16 E.H.R.R. 53 
 
 65. Correia de Matos v. Portugal, 15.11.2001 (Application no. 48188/99) 
 
 66. Pakelli v. Germany, 25.04.1983 (Application no. 8398/78) 
 
 67. Pham Hoang v. France, 29.08.1992, 16 E.H.R.R. 53 
 
 68. Perks and others v. United Kingdom, 12.10.1999 (Application nos. 25277/94, 25279/94, 25280/94, 25282/94, 25285/94, 28048/95, 28192/95, 28456/95) 
 
 69. Quaranta v. Switzerland, 24.05. 1991 (Application no. 12744/87) 
 
 70. Timergaliyev v. Russia, 14.10.2008 (Application no. 40631/02) 
 
 71. M v. United Kingdom (1984) 36 D.R. 155 
 
 72. Lagerblom v. Sweden, 14.01.2003 (Application no. 26891/95) 
 
 73. F. v. United Kingdom (1992), 15 E.H.R.R. CD32 
 
 74. Sadak and Others v. Turkey, 17.07.2001 (Applications nos. 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96) 
 
 75. Kurup v. Denmark, 10.07.1985 (Application no. 11219/84) 
 
 76. Cuscani v. United Kingdom, 24.09.2002 (Application no. 32771/96) 
 
 77. Kamasinski v. Austria, 19.12.1989, 19 E.H.R.R. 36 
 
 78. X. v. Austria (1975), 2 DR68 
 
 79. Lagerblom v. Sweden, 14.01.2003 (Application no. 26891/95)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate