American – Chinese Relations: Turn to Confrontation
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
American – Chinese Relations: Turn to Confrontation
Annotation
PII
S032120680007284-6-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Yuriy Raykov 
Affiliation: Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Pages
20-34
Abstract

The article is devoted to the development of the political process in the Indo-Pacific region – a very important world area. Here interests of word leaders the USA and China and other leading regional powers (Russia, Japan and India) collide. Washington negatively perceives the actions of China, which stands for the establishment of a new multipolar world order and does not intend to put up with the hegemony of the United States. The main issue that irritates the American leadership is the consistent formation by Beijing of structures alternative to the global institutions created after the Second World War. On the American side, attempts are being made to isolate this "revisionist power" from the world community. An important task of China's foreign policy is to strengthen multipolarity in international relations, directed against American hegemony. China is making vigorous efforts to neutralize the attempts of the United States and its allies to contain PRC, to assert its status as a super-power. China's claims to regional leadership are met with persistent opposition from the United States, which seeks to increase tension near the Chinese borders, increasing it around Taiwan, expanding and strengthening the Eastern segment of the U.S. missile defense in South Korea and Japan. The approaches and policies of the most influential states in the Indo–Pacific region are considered in the context of recent events, intertwining and contrasting their interests and the possibility of emergence of international conflicts in this region. Contradictions between the leading States of East Asia are manifested against the background of uncertainty and unpredictability of the USA and China's policies. The article notes that the confrontation between the United States and the People's Republic of China leads to the formation of the countries guided by them, which in fact divides the leading countries of the region into two opposing groups and increases regional tension. Rivalry between superpowers is carried out in the atmosphere of mistrust and suspiciousness, growth of nationalism, urges on a race of arms.

Keywords
United States of America, China, PLA, Taiwan, Senkaku islands, SCO, Silk Road, anti-Chinese coalition, Trans-Pacific Partnership
Received
04.09.2019
Date of publication
29.10.2019
Number of purchasers
89
Views
3496
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S032120680007284-6-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 22.10.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Bychkova T.A. Kitajskaya politika administratsii Baraka Obamy v 2009–2012 gg. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. № 388. S. 106–113.

2. Bogaturov A.D. .2017. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i vneshnyaya politika Rossii. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Aspekt Press», 480 s.

3. Bzhezinskij Zb. 2010. Vybor. Global'noe gospodstvo ili global'noe liderstvo/ Per. s angl. M.: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya, 264 s.

4. Kissindzher Genri. 2015 Mirovoj poryadok [per. s angl. V. Zhelninova, A. Milyukova] .- Moskva: Izdatel'stvo AST, 512 s.

5. Krupyanko M.I., Areshidze L.G. 2010. SShA i Vostochnaya Aziya. Bor'ba za «novyj poryadok». - M.: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya, 448 s.

6. Rajkov Yu.A. Vneshnyaya politika Filippin na rubezhe KhKhI veka. M.: Izd. MGIMO, 2001.

7. Trenin D.V. 2015 Rossiya i mir v KhKhI veke/ Moskva: Izdatel'stvo «Eh».

8. Bychkova T.A. The Chinese policy of the Barack Obama administration in 2009–2012 Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2014. No. 388. r. 106–113 / UDC 327 (73 + 510) “2009/2012 /

9. Bogaturov A. D. International relations and foreign policy of Russia. Moscow: Aspect Press Publishing House, 2017 480 p. Brzezinski Zb. Choice. Global domination or global leadership/translate from English. - M.: International relations, 2010, 64 p,

10. Clinton H. 2011. America's Pacific Century. Foreign Policy, 2011, October 11. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century (accessed: March 12, 2013)

11. Hutchens M., William D. Dries, Jason C. Perdew, Vincent D. Bryant, and Kerry E. Moores;. Joint Concept for Access and Maneuver in the Global Commons A New Joint Operational Concept JFQ 84, 1st Quarter 2017. Available at: https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/Article/1038867/joint-concept-for-access-and-maneuver-in-the-global-commons-a-new-joint-operati (accessed 23.07.2019).

12. Khurana Gurpreet S., (2007) 'Security of Sea Lines: Prospects for India-Japan Cooperation', Strategic Analysis, 31:1, P. - 139 – 153 (The First Academic Paper Explaining 'Indo-Pacific' Concept). Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pacific (accessed 23/06/2019).

13. Khurana Gurpreet S., 2008. India-US Combined Defence Exercises: An Appraisal Article in Strategic Analysis 32(6):1047-1065 · October 2008. DOI: 10.1080/09700160802404554

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate