Везде
PERSONAL INTERPRETATION OF LAW RELATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF RUSSIAN MENTALITY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
PERSONAL INTERPRETATION OF LAW RELATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF RUSSIAN MENTALITY
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000617-5-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A. Slavskaya 
Abstract
The representations of human’s rights were studied in cross-cultural research by Geneva centre with Russia’s participation. In this research the shared (by 35 countries) features of these representations (e.g. values, attitudes to different subjects of human rights’ defend, personal experience of right disturbances) and specificity of Russians’ law consciousness, related to their social position were discovered.
Keywords
interpretation, law representations, values, subjects of human rights defend, needlessness of person.
Date of publication
01.11.2004
Number of purchasers
0
Views
526
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000617-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 18.11.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Abul'khanova-Slavskaya K.A. Sotsial'noe myshlenie lichnosti: problemy i strategii issledovaniya // Psikhol. zhurn. 1994. T. 15. № 4. S. 39-55.        
    2. 

  2. Valki L. Tsennostnoe soderzhanie mezhdunarodnogo prava. Vengerskij meridian // Zhurnal obschestvennykh nauk. 1990. № 31. S. 53-67.
    3. 

  3. Volovikova M.I. Moral'noe razvitie i aktivnost' lichnosti // Aktivnost' i zhiznennaya pozitsiya lichnosti. M., 1988. S. 170-186.            
    4. 

  4. Vseobschaya Deklaratsiya prav cheloveka (10 dekabrya 1948 g.).
    5. 

  5. Danilevskij N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa. SPb., 1995.
    6. 

  6. Duaz V. Yavlenie ankerovki v issledovaniyakh sotsial'nykh predstavlenij // Psikhol. zhurn. 1994. T. 15. № 1. S. 19 - 21.
    7. 

  7. Iering R. Bor'ba za pravo. M., 1991.
    8. 

  8. Lapin N.I. Tsennosti v krizisnom sotsiume. M., 1991. S. 4 - 21.
    9. 

  9. Moskovichi S. Sotsial'nye predstavleniya: istoricheskij vzglyad // Psikhol.zhurn. 1995. T. 18. № 1. S. 3-18; № 2. S. 3-14.
    10. 

  10. Obschaya teoriya prav cheloveka / Otv. red. E.A. Luka-sheva. M., 1996.
    11. 

  11. Prava cheloveka kak faktor strategii ustojchivogo razvitiya / Otv. red. E.A. Lukasheva. M., 2000.
    12. 

  12. Slavskaya A N. Interpretatsiya kak mekhanizm pravovykh predstavlenij lichnosti v rossijskom obschestve // Psikhol. zhurn. 1998. T. 19. № 2. S. 3-14.      
    13. 

  13. Abric S.-Cl. A theoretical and experimental approach to the study of social representations in a situation of interaction // Social representation / Ed. by R.M. Farr, S. Moscovici. Cambridge, 1984.
    14. 

  14. Bond M.N. Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: the Rokeach and Chinese value surveys // J. of Personality and Soc. Psychology. 1988. V. 55. P. 1009-1015.
    15. 

  15. Doise W. L ancrage dans les etudes sur les Representations Sociales // Bulletin de Psychologie. 1992-1993. V. XLV. 405. P. 189-195.
    16. 

  16. Doise W. et al. Human rights in a cross-national context // Europ. Journal of Soc. psychology. 1999. V. 29. P. 1-29.
    17. 

  17. Doise W, Spini D, Clemence A. Human rights studies as social representations in a cross-national context // European journ. of Soc. psychology. 1999. V. 29.
    18. 

  18. Moscovici S. Social influence and social change. L., N.Y., San-Franc.: Academic press, 1976.
    19. 

  19. Roceach M. The nature of human values. N.Y.: Three press, 1973.
    20. 

  20. Spini D, Doise W. Organizing principles of involvement in human rights and their social anchoring in value priorities // Europ. Journal of Soc. psychology. 1998. V. 28. P. 603-622.
    21.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate