- PII
- S013207690002198-9-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S013207690002198-9
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue 12
- Pages
- 30-43
- Abstract
The problems of emergence and development of the Institute of judicial assessors and its various sub-institutions, their status and procedural characteristics, the role and importance in the implementation of justice are considered. The important function of civil society, carried out by judicial assessors, on implementation of public control of judicial activity of professional judges in processes with their participation is designated. The expediency of restoration of the subinstitute of people's assessors by means of its adaptation to today's social and economic realities is proved. Proposals are made to improve the institution of judicial assessors as an important link in the mechanism of domestic justice; it is proposed to develop and adopt a Federal law on judicial assessors.
- Keywords
- court assessors – arbitration, jury, people, improvement of the mechanism of judicial power, democracy in the implementation of justice
- Date of publication
- 22.12.2018
- Number of purchasers
- 12
- Views
- 2413
References
- 1. Lur'e I.M. Ocherki drevneegipetskogo prava XVI–X vekov do n.eh. Pamyatniki i issledovaniya. L., 1960. S. 108.
- 2. Kleandrov M.I. Otvetstvennost' sud'i. M., 2011. S. 86.
- 3. Chel'tsov-Bebutov M.A. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnoprotsessual'nogo prava: ocherki po istorii suda i ugolovnogo protsessa v rabovladel'cheskikh, feodal'nykh i burzhuaznykh gosudarstvakh. SPb., 1995. S. 97.
- 4. Bojkov A.D. Tret'ya vlast' v Rossii. Ocherki o pravosudii, zakonnosti i sudebnoj reforme 1990–1996 gg. M., 1997. S. 27.
- 5. Zhil'tsov S.V. Ukaz. soch. (tsit. po: Vestnik Vremennogo pravitel'stva. 1917. № 19/65; Zhurnal Ministerstva yustitsii. 1917. № 4. S. 189).
- 6. Kutafin O.E., Lebedev V.M., Semigin G.Yu. Sudebnaya vlast' v Rossii: istoriya, dokumenty: v 6 t. T. 5. M., 2003. S.48.
- 7. Gorbuz A.K., Krasnov M.A., Mishina E.A., Satarov G.V. Transformatsiya rossijskoj sudebnoj vlasti. Opyt kompleksnogo analiza. SPb., 2010. S. 80.
- 8. Kleandrov M.I. Status arbitrazhnykh, narodnykh i prisyazhnykh zasedatelej: ucheb. posobie. M., 2000. S. 44; Izvestiya. 1997. 25 iyunya.
- 9. Alebastrova I.A. Obschestvennyj kontrol' za publichnoj vlast'yu v Rossii: bolezni rosta ili zaderzhki razvitiya // Ross. yurid. zhurnal. 2018. № 2(119). S. 11.
- 10. Fokov A.P. Pravosudie s uchastiem grazhdan v Rossii // Ross. sud'ya. 2009. № 8.
- 11. Kovalev N. Narodnoe uchastie v otpravlenii pravosudiya v stranakh SNG: sud prisyazhnykh ili sheffenov? // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2006. № 2 (55). S. 16.
- 12. Parutto S.V., Smirnov V.V. Prisyazhnye i arbitrazhnye zasedateli: teoriya i praktika. M., 2008.
- 13. Golovko L.V. Teoreticheskie i sravnitel'no-pravovye podkhody k opredeleniyu modeli uchastiya grazhdan k otpravleniyu pravosudiya po ugolovnym delam // Ross. pravosudie. 2015. № 6. S. 23–32.
