Везде
METAMORPHOSES: ESSENCE, INCREASINGLY COMPLEX TYPES, PLACE IN SOCIOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
METAMORPHOSES: ESSENCE, INCREASINGLY COMPLEX TYPES, PLACE IN SOCIOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000338-7-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Sergey A. Kravchenko 
ORCID: 0000-0003-2528-5703
Edition
Volume 402 Issue 10
Pages
3-14
Abstract
Metamorphoses as physical and social phenomena have always existed. However, their nature changes significantly under the influence of the acceleration and complexity of social and cultural dynamics, as a result of which there appear a pluralization and complication of their types. The article is devoted to the analysis of the interpretation of this phenomenon in philosophy and sociology at different stages of the development of the sciences. The double actuality of metamorphoses is shown – they can have both objective grounds and be the act of a social construct. As the social development becomes more complex, metamorphoses acquire the character of non-linear transformations, functional ambivalences, contributing to both disintegration and integration of the society, exerting destructive and humane influences.The new generation of metamorphoses is due to the entry of mankind into “turbulent times” which gave rise to more complex factors of their production in the globolocal spaces. Metamorphoses in the form of “collateral damage” and metamorphoses of post-Soviet Russia are specially considered. There are particularly analyzed metamorphoses as “positive side effects of the bad” the nature of which is revealed in the concept of U. Beck “the metamorphosis of the world”, which goes beyond his theory of “world risk society”.
Keywords
metamorphosis, unforeseen events, nonlinear transformations, turbulence, centaurisms, phantoms, “positive side effects of the bad”
Date of publication
01.10.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
465
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0132-16250000338-7-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 02.10.2020
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Beck U. (2001) What is Globalization? Moscow: Progress-Traditsiia. (In Russ.)


Berger P. (2004) The Cultural Dynamics of Globalization. In: P.L. Berger and S.P. Huntington (eds.) Many Globalizations: Cultural Diversity in the Contemporary World. Moscow: Aspect Press.


Baudrillard J. (2003) For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. Moscow: Biblion-Russkaja kniga.


Baudrillard J. (2000) Symbolic Exchange and Death. Moscow: Dobrosvet.


Heraclitus of Ephesus (1910) Fragments. Moscow: Мусагет.


Goffman I. (2004) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Moscow: Institute of Sociology RAS.


Goffman I. (2000) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Moscow: KANON-PRESS.


Kravchenko S.A. (2014) “Normal Anomie”: Contours of Conception. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 8: 3–10. (In Russ.)


Kravchenko S.A. (2012) Complex Socium: Need for the Turns in Sociolology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 5: 19–29. (In Russ.)


Kravchenko S.A., Salygin V.I. (2015) A New Synthesis of Scientific Knowledge: the Making of Interdisciplinary Science. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 10: 22–30. (In Russ.)


Marx K. (1960) Capital. In: Marx K., Engels F. Essays. Vol I, 2nd edition. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.)


International Consent as a Source of Consolidation of the Russian Society (2016). Moscow: Institute of Sociology RAS. (In Russ.)


Gorshkov M.K., Krum R., Perukhov V.V. (eds) (2009) Russia on a New Fracture: Fears and Anxieties. Moscow: Alpha-M. (In Russ.)


Sorokin P.A. (1993) The main trends nowadays. Moscow: Institute of Sociology RAS. (In Russ.)


Sorokin P.A. (2009) The Crisis of Our Age. Moscow: ISPS RAS. (In Russ.)


Sorokin P.A. (2000) Social and Cultural Dynamics: Social and Cultural Dynamics: A Study of Change in Major Systems of Art, Truth, Ethics, Law and Social Relationships. Saint-Petersburg: ZHGI. (In Russ.)


Sorokin P.A. (1992) Human Being. Civilization. Society. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.)


Toffler A. (2003) Power Shift. Knowledge, Wealth, and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)


Toshchenko J.T. (2011) Centaur-Problem (an Attempt of Philosophical and Sociological Analysis). Moscow: Novyi Khronograf. (In Russ.)


Toshchenko J.T. (2015) Phantoms of the Russia Society. Moscow: Center of Sociological Forecast and Marketing. (In Russ.)


Sztompka P. (2001) Social change as a trauma. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 1: 6–16. (In Russ.)


Elwell W. (ed.) (2003) Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. Moscow: Association “Spiritual Renaissance”. (In Russ.)


Yadov V.A. (2002) Some Sociological Basics for Forecasting the Future of the Russian Society. In: Russia under Reforms. Moscow: Academia: 249–263. (In Russ.)


Yanitskii O.N. (2016) Sociobiotechnolohial Systems: New Look of the Interaction of the Human and Nature. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika [Sociological science and Social Practice] No 3: 5–22. (In Russ.)


Ageing Societies, New Sociology (2003). In: The 6th Conference of the European Sociological Association. Murcia (Spain), 23–26 September.


Baudrillard J. (1995) The Gulf War Did not Take Place. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.


Bauman Z. (2011) Collateral Damage. Social Inequalities in a Global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.


Bauman Z. (2011) Liquid Times. Living in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.


Bauman Z. (2016) Strangers at our Door. Cambridge: Polity Press.


Bauman Z., Donskis L. (2016) Liquid Evil. Living with TINA. Cambridge: Polity Press.


Beck U. (2010) World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.


Beck U. (2016) The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.


Foucault M. (1986) Of Other Spaces. Diacritics, 1.


Goffman E. (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. N.Y.: Simon and Schuster.


Goffman E. (1952) On Cooling the Mark Out: Some Aspects of Adaptation to Failure. Psychiatry. No 15 (4): 451–463.


Lash S., Urry J. (1994) Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage.


Lash S., Urry J. (1987) The End of Organized Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.


Merton R. (1976) Sociological Ambivalence. N.Y.: Free Press.


Ritzer G. (2004) The Globalization of Nothing. University of Maryland: Pine Forge Press.


Social Relations in Turbulent Times. ESA 10th Conference (2011). Geneva, 7–10 September, 2011.


Sztompka P. (1991) Society in Action: A Theory of Social Becoming. Cambridge.


Turner B.S. (1992) Regulating Bodies: Essays in Medical Sociology. London: Routledge.


Yanitsky O.N. (2014) Sociology of Critical Areas. Open Journal of Social Science Research. Vol. 2 (3): 112–118.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate