RAS Social ScienceГосударство и право Gosudarstvo i pravo

  • ISSN (Print) 1026-9452
  • ISSN (Online) 2713-0398

Functional Approach in Bhartṛhari's and Dharmakīrti's Philosophical Systems

PII
S004287440003630-8-
DOI
10.31857/S004287440003630-8
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 1
Pages
164-172
Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the functional approach in the philosophical systems of Bhartṛhari (5 CE) and Dharmakīrti (7 CE). In Dharmakīrti's works the functional approach is manifested in the concept of arthakriyā. Arthakriyā is introduced in order to justify inference as an instrument of valid knowledge. Somewhat similar to arthakriyā is the concept of activity (vyavahāra) met with occasionally in Bhartṛhari's Vākyapadīya. Yet another parallel to Dharmakīrti's arthakriyā is the general functional approach introduced repeatedly by Bhartṛhari in order to justify mutually exclusive doctrines on account of their agreement with the common usage. In this paper I will discuss the similarities and differences between vyavahāra and arthakriyā, their role in Bhartṛhari's and Dharmakīrti's philosophical systems and the possible relation of the functional tendencies in Bhartṛhari's linguistic philosophy and the Buddhist Pramāṇavāda. 

Keywords
Bhartṛhari, Vākyapadīya, Dharmakīrti, arthakriyā, vyavahāra, Indian philosophy, Indian epistemological theories, Indian linguistic philosophy, Buddhist philosophy
Date of publication
19.02.2019
Year of publication
2019
Number of purchasers
89
Views
1019

References

  1. 1. Das, Sarat Chandra (1997) A Tibetan-English Dictionary, Asian Educational Services, New Delhi.
  2. 2. Cardona, George (1999) “Approaching the Vakyapadiya”, The Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 119, pp. 88–125.
  3. 3. Desnitskaya, Evgeniya A. (2011) “Discussion on the Referent of the Word in Bhart?hari's 'Vakyapadiya'”, Sabdaprakasa: Studies in Honour of G.A. Zograf, Vol. 1, pp. 175–192 (in Russian).
  4. 4. Desnitskaya, Evgeniya (2016) “Pasyanti, Pratibha, Spho?a and Jati: Ontology and Epistemology in the Vakyapadiya”, Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol. 44, pp. 325–335.
  5. 5. Desnitskaya, Evgeniya A. (2017a) “Discussion on Semantic Relation in Bhartrhari’s Sa?bandha-samuddesa and Dharmakirti’s Sa?bandha-pariksa?”, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 5 (2017), pp. 186–195 (in Russian).
  6. 6. Desnitskaya, Evgeniya A. (2017b) “Perspectivism as a Philosophical Strategy in Bhart?hari’s ‘Vakyapadiya’”, RUDN Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 21, pp. 33–41 (in Russian).
  7. 7. Dravid, Raja Ram (1975) The Problem of Universals in Indian Philosophy, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi.
  8. 8. Dreyfus, George (1995) “Is Dharmakirti a pragmatist?”, Asiatische Studien, Vol. 49, pp. 671–691.
  9. 9. Dunne, John D. (2004). Foundations of Dharmakirti's philosophy, Wisdom Publications, Boston.
  10. 10. Eltschinger, Vincent (2013) “Buddhist Esoterism and Epistemology: Two Sixth-Century Innovations as Buddhist Responses to Social and Religio-Political Transformations”, Franco, Eli, ed. Periodization and Historiography of Indian Philosophy, de Nobili, Wien, pp. 171–273.
  11. 11. Franco, Eli (2013) “On the periodization and historiography of Indian Philosophy”, Franco, Eli, ed. Periodization and Historiography of Indian Philosophy, de Nobili, Wien, pp. 1–34.
  12. 12. Hattori, Masaaki (1968) Dignaga, On Perception, Harvard Oriental Series, Cambridge.
  13. 13. Houben, Jan E.M. (1995). The Sa?bandha-samuddesa (chapter on Relation) and Bhart?hari's Philosophy of Language: A Study of Bhart?hari Sa?bandha-samuddesa in the Context of the Vakyapadiya, with a Translation of Helaraja's Commentary Prakir?a-prakasa, Egbert Forsten, Groningen.
  14. 14. Houben, Jan E.M. (1997) “Bhart?hari’s perspectivism (1): The V?tti and Bhart?hari's Perspectivism in the First ka??a of the Vakyapadiya”, Franco, Eli, Preisendanz, Karin, eds. Beyond Orientalism. The Work of Wilhelm Halbfass and its Impact on Indian and Cross-Cultural Studies, Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Amsterdam, Atlanta, pp. 317–358.
  15. 15. Kano, Kyo (1991) “On the Background of PV II 12ab – The Origin of Dharmakirti's Idea of arthakriya”, Steinkellner, Ernst, ed. Studies in the Buddhist Epistemological Tradition: Proceedings of the Second Dharmakirti's International Conference, Vienna, June 11–16, 1989, Verlag der Osterreichischen Akademie der Wissentschaften, Wien, pp.119–128.
  16. 16. Katsura, Shoryu (1984) “Dharmakirti's theory of truth”, Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol. 12, pp. 215–235.
  17. 17. Lindtner, Christian (1982) Nagarjuniana: Studies in the Writings and Philosophy of Nagarjuna, Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen.
  18. 18. Lindtner, Christian (1993) “Linking up Bhart?hari and the Bauddhas”, Asiatische Studien / Etudes Asiatiques, Vol. 47, pp.195–213.
  19. 19. Nagatomi, Masatoshi (1967) “Arthakriya”, Adyar library bulletin, Vol. 31, pp. 52–72.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library